Assessing Digital Health Implementation for a Pediatric Chronic Pain Intervention: Comparing the RE-AIM and BIT Frameworks Against Real-World Trial Data and Recommendations for Future Studies.

dc.centroFacultad de Psicología y Logopediaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDe la Vega, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorRitterband, Lee
dc.contributor.authorPalermo, Tonya M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T11:42:46Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T11:42:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departamentoPersonalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico
dc.description.abstractBackground: Digital health interventions have demonstrated efficacy for several conditions including for pediatric chronic pain. However, the process of making interventions available to end users in an efficient and sustained way is challenging and remains a new area of research. To advance this field, comprehensive frameworks have been created. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Behavior Interventions using Technology (BIT) frameworks with data collected from the web-based management of adolescent pain (WebMAP Mobile; WMM) randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: We conducted a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster RCT with a stepped wedge design in which the intervention was sequentially implemented in 8 clinics, following a usual care period. Participants were 143 youths (mean age 14.5 years, SD 1.9; 117/143, 81.8% female) with chronic pain, from which 73 were randomized to receive the active intervention. Implementation outcomes were assessed using the RE-AIM and BIT frameworks. Conclusions: For the first time, a real-world digital health intervention was used as a proof of concept to test all the domains in the RE-AIM and BIT frameworks, allowing for comparisons.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the American Pain Society and Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning and Change (grant ID #: 27971161, principal investigator: Palermo). The study sponsor and funders had no role in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication. 2Morrow.inc was responsible for software development. The authors thank the participating clinics for their involvement in the study: Seattle Children's Hospital (gastroenterology clinic and pain clinic), Children's Mercy Medical Center (abdominal pain clinic and pain clinic), C.S. Mott Children's Hospital (pain clinic), Nationwide Children's Hospital (pain clinic), and Connecticut Children's Medical Center (gastroenterology clinic and pain clinic).es_ES
dc.identifier.citationDe la Vega, R., Ritterband, L., Palermo, T.M. (2020). Assessing Digital Health Implementation for a Pediatric Chronic Pain Intervention: Comparing the RE-AIM and BIT Frameworks Against Real-World Trial Data and Recommendations for Future Studies. JMIR, 22 (9), e19898. PMID: 32870158. doi: 10.2196/19898es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/19898
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/36731
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJMIRes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDolor crónicoes_ES
dc.subjectPediatríaes_ES
dc.subjectElectrónica médicaes_ES
dc.subject.otherMobile healthes_ES
dc.subject.othereHealthes_ES
dc.subject.othermHealthes_ES
dc.subject.otherImplementation sciencees_ES
dc.subject.otherChronic paines_ES
dc.subject.otherAdolescentses_ES
dc.subject.otherMobile phonees_ES
dc.titleAssessing Digital Health Implementation for a Pediatric Chronic Pain Intervention: Comparing the RE-AIM and BIT Frameworks Against Real-World Trial Data and Recommendations for Future Studies.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessing Digital Health Implementation for a Pediatric Chronic Pain Intervention. Comparing the REAIM and BIT Frameworks Against RealWorld Trial Data and Recommendations for Future Studies.pdf
Size:
149.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo principal
Download

Description: Artículo principal

Collections