Patterns of morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of mammalian carnivores.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Reading date

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford Academic

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Department/Institute

Abstract

We investigated patterns of evolutionary integration in the appendicular skeleton of mammalian carnivores. The findings are discussed in relation to performance selection in terms of organismal function as a potential mechanism underlying integration. Interspecific shape covariation was quantified by two-block partial least-squares (2B-PLS) analysis of 3D landmark data within a phylogenetic context. Specifically, we compared pairs of anatomically connected bones (within-limbs) and pairs of both serially homologous and functional equivalent bones (between-limbs). The statistical results of all the comparisons suggest that the carnivoran appendicular skeleton is highly integrated. Strikingly, the main shape covariation relates to bone robustness in all cases. A bootstrap test was used to compare the degree of integration between specialized cursorial taxa (i.e., those whose forelimbs are primarily involved in locomotion) and noncursorial species (i.e., those whose forelimbs are involved in more functions than their hindlimb) showed that cursors have a more integrated appendicular skeleton than noncursors. The findings demonstrate that natural selection can influence the pattern and degree of morphological integration by increasing the degree of bone shape covariation in parallel to ecological specialization

Description

Política de acceso abierto tomada de: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/6866?template=romeo

Bibliographic citation

Martín-Serra A, Figueirido B, Pérez-Claros JA and Palmqvist P. 2015. Patterns of morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of mammalian carnivores. Evolution 69: 321-340

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by