Mothers’ Autonomy or Social Constraints? Coherence and Inconsistency Between Attitudes and Employment Trajectories in Different Welfare Regimes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Garcia Faroldi-Social Politics-2020-Accepted version-.pdf (1021.6 KB)

Description: Esta es la versión aceptada del artículo, que es la que permite incluir la revista en el repositorio tras 24 meses de embargo.

Identifiers

Publication date

Reading date

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford Academy

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper examines the coherence between mothers' work-family attitudes and behaviors using data from the Czech Republic, Germany, Great Britain, Norway and Spain from ISSP (1994, 2002 and 2012). Findings show that mother's attitudes are more constrained than Hakim's preference theory suggests: i) Between one and two thirds of mothers experience inconsistency between preferences and employment. (ii) Norwegian and Czech mothers' agency has increased in this period, while in Germany and Spain results are mixed. (iii) The options of British mothers with preschool children have worsened. (iv) Norway currently has the greatest coherence between preferences and employment trajectories.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Livia García-Faroldi, Mothers’ Autonomy or Social Constraints? Coherence and Inconsistency Between Attitudes and Employment Trajectories in Different Welfare Regimes, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 27, Issue 1, Spring 2020, Pages 97–127, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy030

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by