Placenta-derived biomaterials vs. standard care in chronic diabetic foot ulcer healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Muñoz, María
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Barrios, Francisco-Javier
dc.contributor.authorLópezosa-Reca, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T10:24:36Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T10:24:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departamentoEnfermería
dc.description.abstractMethods The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard. The electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (WoS) internet were searched for the outcome rate of complete ulcer healing. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using the tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analysis included the individual and combined result of the studies, heterogeneity test, the effect size, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias tests. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 833 patients were included in this study. This meta-analysis showed a higher rate of complete ulcer healing in groups receiving placenta-derived biomaterials therapies (OR = 6.247 [4.425, 8.819], p < 0.01, I2 = 41 %) compared to control groups. Conclusion Placenta-derived biomaterials therapies have been shown to be more effective for achieving complete ulcer healing compared to current conventional treatments in DFU. Implications for clinical practice The utilization of placenta-derived biomaterials in therapies for wound healing, particularly in chronic DFU, presents promising implications for clinical practice. These biomaterials offer a rich source of growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix components, which can stimulate tissue regeneration and angiogenesis. Incorporating such therapies into clinical practice holds the potential to accelerate wound closure, reduce infection rates, and improve overall healing outcomes in people with diabetic chronic foot ulcers. Furthermore, the availability of these biomaterials can offer clinicians a readily-accessible and cost-effective alternative to traditional wound care approaches, ultimately enhancing patient care and quality of life. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for open access charge: Universidad de Málaga / CBUAes_ES
dc.identifier.citationMaria Ruiz-Muñoz, Francisco-Javier Martinez-Barrios, Eva Lopezosa-Reca, Placenta-derived biomaterials vs. standard care in chronic diabetic foot ulcer healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, Volume 19, Issue 1, 2025, 103170, ISSN 1871-4021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103170es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103170
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/35827
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPlacentaes_ES
dc.subjectDiabetes - Complicaciones y secuelases_ES
dc.subject.otherPlacenta-derived biomaterials therapieses_ES
dc.subject.otherDiabetic foot diseasees_ES
dc.subject.otherMeta-analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherUlcer treatmentes_ES
dc.subject.otherHuman umbilical cordes_ES
dc.subject.otherAmniotic membranees_ES
dc.titlePlacenta-derived biomaterials vs. standard care in chronic diabetic foot ulcer healing: A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication17f274b8-6474-410f-8a9c-02711212c6e3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication66cc99ad-de66-485f-83f5-9e03a5fd1d84
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f274b8-6474-410f-8a9c-02711212c6e3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1871402124002315-main.pdf
Size:
5.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections