Measurement Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Commonly Used Instruments

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Andrades, Maria Jose
dc.contributor.authorVinolo-Gil, Maria Jesus
dc.contributor.authorCasuso Holgado, María Jesús
dc.contributor.authorBarón-López, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huguet, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Valero, Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T09:15:33Z
dc.date.available2023-05-17T09:15:33Z
dc.date.created2023-05-17
dc.date.issued2023-02-14
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractBackground: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease. There is no evidence on the analysis of the measurement instruments available to assess quality of life in these patients, following the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist; (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, PEDro, Web of Science and Cochrane. The psychometric properties of the questionnaires were determined by using the COSMIN checklist. Two searches were carried out. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021249005); (3) Results: There were four published articles that analysed the measurement properties in patients with ALS for the following scales: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 40, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Short Form 36 Healthy Survey, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Sickness Impact Profile. Another five scales also met the inclusion criteria: ALS-Depression-Inventory, State Trait Anxiety-Inventory, World Health Organization Quality of Life, Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire 5. Most Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) present a low-quality synthesis of evidence. It was observed an excellent pooled reliability of 0.92 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.83–0.96, I2 = 87.3%) for four dimensions for questionnaires ALSAQ-40. (4) Conclusions: There is little evidence on generic instruments. Future studies are necessary to develop new tools.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for open access charge: Universidad de Málaga / CBUAes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph20043310
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/26578
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEsclerosis lateral amiotrófica - Pronósticoes_ES
dc.subjectCalidad de vidaes_ES
dc.subjectEsclerosis lateral amiotrófica - Aspectos psicológicoses_ES
dc.subject.otherQuality of lifees_ES
dc.subject.otherAmyotrophic lateral sclerosises_ES
dc.subject.otherDesign questionnairees_ES
dc.subject.otherValidation studieses_ES
dc.subject.otherPatient reported outcome measureses_ES
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titleMeasurement Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Commonly Used Instrumentses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3b266353-b265-450e-9d7e-0deb315db813
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5caa295d-5e0c-47f7-97bd-a7e384cd66a9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3b266353-b265-450e-9d7e-0deb315db813

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijerph-20-03310.pdf
Size:
4.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections