The quality of dying and death measurement instruments: A systematic psychometric review.

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Sánchez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Cruzado, David Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T09:32:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T09:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departamentoEnfermería
dc.descriptionPolítica de acceso abierto tomada de: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/7035es_ES
dc.description.abstractTo identify instruments that could assess the quality of dying and death andtheir psychometric properties. To assess the methodological quality of studies onmeasurement properties.Background: A high quality of death is regarded as a goal at the end of life and,therefore, an assessment of the end of life experience is essential. Many instrumentshave been developed to evaluate the quality of dying and death. The selection ofthe most appropriate measure to be used in clinical and research settings is crucial.Design: Psychometric systematic review.Data Sources: We systematically searched ProQuest Medline, SciELO and ProQuestPsycINFO from 1970 - May 2016.Review Methods: Identification and evaluation of instruments that assessed qualityof dying and death. Papers were evaluated by two independent reviewers accordingto the COSMIN checklist with a 4-point scale.Results: A total of 19 studies were included in this review. Seven instruments werefound that were specifically designed for assessing quality of dying and death. A ret-rospective carer proxy report to evaluate this construct was used in most of thepapers. The methodological quality of the studies was fair for most of the psycho-metric characteristics analyzed.Conclusion: Many instruments have been developed to assess the quality of dyingand death. The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire is the best available mea-sure of the quality of dying and death. It is the only questionnaire identified in thisreview where all psychometric properties according to the COSMIN checklist havebeen evaluatedes_ES
dc.identifier.citationGutiérrez Sánchez D, Pérez Cruzado D, Cuesta-Vargas AI. The quality of dying and death measurement instruments: A systematic psychometric review. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 74: 1803–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13687es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.13687
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/34725
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectMuerte - Aspectos psicológicoses_ES
dc.subjectCuidados terminaleses_ES
dc.subject.otherInstrumentses_ES
dc.subject.otherNursinges_ES
dc.subject.otherOutcome Measurees_ES
dc.subject.otherEnd of lifees_ES
dc.subject.otherGood deathes_ES
dc.subject.otherOutcome measurees_ES
dc.subject.otherPsychometric propertieses_ES
dc.subject.otherPsychometric systematic reviewes_ES
dc.titleThe quality of dying and death measurement instruments: A systematic psychometric review.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6be2fc84-ad50-43e1-b5c7-ede79057e879
relation.isAuthorOfPublication636ed082-6d1a-4c86-abe1-5a1dc630a6a7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6be2fc84-ad50-43e1-b5c7-ede79057e879

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RS_QODD_FINAL.pdf
Size:
631.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections