Health Economic Evaluation of Lung Cancer Screening Using a Diagnostic Blood Test: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS)
| dc.centro | Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Robles-Zurita, José Antonio | |
| dc.contributor.author | McMeekin, Nicola | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sullivan, Frank | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mair, Frances S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Briggs, Andrew | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-21T11:45:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-21T11:45:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-18 | |
| dc.departamento | Economía Aplicada (Estadística y Econometría) | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Diagnostic blood tests have the potential to identify lung cancer in people at high risk. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a lung cancer screening intervention, using the EarlyCDT®-Lung Test (ECLS) with subsequent X-ray and low-dose chest CT scans (LDCT) for patients with a positive test result, compared to both usual care and LDCT screening for the target population. Methods: We conducted a model-based lifetime analysis from a UK NHS and personal social services perspective. We estimated incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) for the ECLS intervention compared to no screening and to LDCT screening. Results: The incremental NMB of ECLS intervention compared to no screening was GBP 33,179 (95% CI: −GBP 81,396, GBP 147,180) and GBP 140,609 (95% CI: −GBP 36,255, GBP 316,612), respectively, for a cost-effectiveness threshold of GBP 20,000 and GBP 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year. The same figures compared with LDCT screening were GBP 162,095 (95% CI: GBP 52,698, GBP 271,735) and GBP 52,185 (95% CI: −GBP 115,152, GBP 219,711). Conclusions: The ECLS intervention is the most cost-effective screening alternative, with the highest probability of being cost-effective, when compared to no screening or LDCT screening. This result may change with modifications of the parameters, suggesting that the three alternatives considered in the main analysis are potentially cost-effective. | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Funding for the ECLS study was received from Oncimmune Ltd. and the Scottish Government Health & Social Care Directorate of the Chief Scientist Office (CSO). | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | Health Economic Evaluation of Lung Cancer Screening Using a Diagnostic Blood Test: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS). Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31, 3546–3562. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/curroncol31060261 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/ 10.3390/curroncol31060261 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10630/36641 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Análisis coste-beneficio | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | cost-effectiveness | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | economic evaluation | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | lung cancer | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | screening | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | diagnostic blood test | es_ES |
| dc.title | Health Economic Evaluation of Lung Cancer Screening Using a Diagnostic Blood Test: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS) | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 2024_Current oncology.pdf
- Size:
- 1.26 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:

