The Manchester Procedure as a Uterine-Preserving Alternative for Uterine Prolapse Due to Cervical Elongation: A Short- and Mid-Term Clinical Analysis
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Share
Center
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition that negatively
impacts women’s quality of life. Uterine-preserving procedures are increasingly
demanded by patients with uterine prolapse, particularly when associated with true cervical
elongation. The Manchester procedure, historically used for uterine preservation, has
regained interest due to its effectiveness and low morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the
anatomical and functional outcomes of the Manchester procedure in women with uterine
prolapse due to cervical elongation, assessing patient satisfaction and associated clinical
factors. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center
study at the Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Spain, including patients undergoing
the Manchester procedure between January 2017 and December 2022. Inclusion criteria
required a diagnosis of uterine prolapse due to clinically confirmed true cervical elongation.
Surgical details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Patient satisfaction
was assessed using a Likert scale during follow-up visits. Results: A total of 38 patients
were included, with a mean age of 48.7 years. All presented with symptomatic uterine
prolapse and elongated cervix (>5 cm). The anatomical success rate was 97%, with only one
case of symptomatic recurrence. The most common early postoperative complication was
urinary tract infection (10.5%). The average follow-up duration was 18.6 months. A high
level of satisfaction was recorded: 94.8% of patients were either “very satisfied” (73.7%)
or “satisfied” (21.1%), and only 5.3% reported dissatisfaction. Multicompartmental repair
(anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy) improved satisfaction outcomes. Conclusions: The
Manchester procedure is a safe, effective uterine-sparing surgical option for patients with
cervical elongation-related uterine prolapse. It demonstrates a high anatomical success
rate and low morbidity, with excellent patient satisfaction. Comprehensive preoperative
assessment and addressing modifiable risk factors such as obesity and smoking are key to
optimizing results. Further prospective studies are needed to assess long-term durability
and quality-of-life outcomes.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Liger Guerra C, Sabonet Morente L, Hidalgo Fernandez JM, Navarro Romero M, Gonzalez CE, Jimenez-Lopez JS. The Manchester Procedure as a Uterine-Preserving Alternative for Uterine Prolapse Due to Cervical Elongation: A Short- and Mid-Term Clinical Analysis. Medicina. 2025; 61(7):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071183
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced by
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International







