Qualitative ultrasonography scale of the intensity of local twitch response during dry needling and its association with modified joint range of motion: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorCruz-Montecinos, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCerda, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorBecerra, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorTapia, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Cortés, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorLatorre-García, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Sandro R.
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T11:57:58Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T11:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-14
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractBackground: The relevance of local twitch response (LTR) during dry needling technique (DNT) is controversial, and it is questioned whether LTR is necessary for successful outcomes. Furthermore, because the LTR during the deep DNT may be evoked with different intensities, it is unknown whether the magnitude of LTR intensity is associated with optimal clinical results, especially concerning to the effects of joint maximal range of motion (ROM). This study aimed to (i) determine whether visual inspections can quantify the LTR intensity during the DNT through a qualitative ultrasonography scale of LTR intensity (US-LTR scale), and (ii) assess the differences of US-LTR scale associated with changes in the maximal joint ROM. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, seven asymptomatic individuals were treated with DNT in the latent myofascial trigger point in both medial gastrocnemius muscles. During DNT, three consecutive LTRs were collected. The US-LTR scale was used to classify the LTRs into strong, medium, and weak intensities. The categories of US-LTR were differentiated by the velocity of LTRs using the optical flow algorithm. ROM changes in ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension were assessed before and immediately after DNT. Results: The US-LTR scale showed the third LTR was significantly smaller than the first one (p < 0.05). A significant difference in velocity was observed between US-LTR categories (p < 0.001). A significant difference in the ROM was observed between the strong and weak-medium intensity (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The present findings suggest that the LTR intensity can be assessed using a qualitative US-LTR scale, and the effects of DNT on joint maximal ROM is maximized with higher LTR intensity. This study reports a novel qualitative method for LTR analysis with potential applications in research and clinical settings. However, further research is needed to achieve a broader application.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCruz-Montecinos C, Cerda M, Becerra P, Tapia C, Núñez-Cortés R, Latorre-García R, Freitas SR, Cuesta-Vargas A. Qualitative ultrasonography scale of the intensity of local twitch response during dry needling and its association with modified joint range of motion: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 14;22(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04592-z. PMID: 34521384; PMCID: PMC8442322.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-021-04592-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/35987
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMC Springer Naturees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectUltrasonidos en medicinaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDry Needlinges_ES
dc.subject.otherLocal Twitch Responsees_ES
dc.subject.otherRange of Motiones_ES
dc.subject.otherTrigger Pointses_ES
dc.subject.otherUltrasoundes_ES
dc.titleQualitative ultrasonography scale of the intensity of local twitch response during dry needling and its association with modified joint range of motion: a cross-sectional studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021 Qualitative ultrasonography scale of the intensity of local twitch response during dry needling and its association with modified joint range of motion a crosssectional study.pdf
Size:
1001.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections