Specialisation versus special interest - the Australian podiatry experience.

dc.contributor.authorDavies, Ainslie
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNancarrow, Susan
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T12:33:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T12:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractBackground: Ensuring efficient and effective delivery of health care to an ageing population has been a major driver for a review of the health workforce in Australia. As part of this process a National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) has evolved with one goal being to improve workforce flexibility within a nationally consistent model of governance. In addition to increased flexibility, there have been discussions about maintaining standards and the role of specialisation. This study aims to explore the association between practitioners' self-perceptions about their special interest in musculoskeletal, diabetes related and podopaediatric foot care and the actual podiatry services they deliver in Australia. Methods: A cross sectional on-line survey was administered on behalf of the Australasian Podiatry Council and its' state based member associations. Self-reported data were collected over a 3-week interval and captured information about the practitioners by gender, years of clinical experience, area of work by state, work setting, and location. Results: 218 podiatrists participated in the survey. Participants were predominately female and worked in private practices. The largest area of personal interest by the podiatrists was related to the field of musculoskeletal podiatry (n = 65), followed closely by diabetes foot care (n = 61), and a third area identified was in the management of podopaediatric conditions (n = 26). Conclusions: Health workforce reform in Australia is in part being managed by the federal government with a goal to meet the health care needs of Australians into the future. The recognition of a specialty registration of podiatric surgery and endorsement for scheduled medicines was established with this workforce reform in mind.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationDavies A, Bennett P, Nancarrow S, Cuesta-Vargas A. Specialisation versus special interest - the Australian podiatry experience. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Dec 3;8:69. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0127-0. PMID: 26640523; PMCID: PMC4669669.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13047-015-0127-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/37849
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectPodologíaes_ES
dc.subject.otherHealth workforcees_ES
dc.subject.otherPodiatryes_ES
dc.subject.otherScope of practicees_ES
dc.subject.otherSpecialisationes_ES
dc.subject.otherSubstitutiones_ES
dc.subject.otherDiversificationes_ES
dc.titleSpecialisation versus special interest - the Australian podiatry experience.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015 Specialisation versus special interest – the Australian podiatry experience.pdf
Size:
419.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections