Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huguet, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGóngora-Rodríguez, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huguet, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Valero, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Fernández, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorLomas-Vega, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T12:20:29Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T12:20:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-12
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractSupraspinatus tendinopathy is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Many studies support conservative treatments such as exercise, trigger point dry needling or corticosteroid injections. Otherwise, a minimally invasive approach with percutaneous electrolysis (PE) has also been used successfully in shoulder pain, although evidence about its long-term effects is scarce. The aim of this trial was to determine the effects of PE on supraspinatus tendinopathy compared with trigger point dry needling (TDN). Thirty-six patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy were randomly assigned to either a PE group (n = 18) or a TDN group (n = 18). Both groups also performed eccentric exercises. The main outcome to be measured was the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), but the shoulder range of motion (ROM) and trigger point pressure pain threshold (PPT) were also considered. A one-year follow-up was conducted. Significant differences favoring the PE group were found regarding pain at one-year follow-up (p = 0.002). The improvement achieved in the PE group was greater in the NPRS (p < 0.001), proximal PPT, middle PPT, distal PPT (all p < 0.001) and ranges of movement. PE seems to be more effective than TDN in relieving pain and improving ROM and PPT supraspinatus values in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy, both right after treatment and at one-year follow-up.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez-Huguet M, Góngora-Rodríguez J, Rodríguez-Huguet P, Ibañez-Vera AJ, Rodríguez-Almagro D, Martín-Valero R, Díaz-Fernández Á, Lomas-Vega R. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):1837. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061837.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm9061837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/35209
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMPDIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectHombros - Lesiones y heridases_ES
dc.subjectFisioterapiaes_ES
dc.subject.othersupraspinatus tendinopathyes_ES
dc.subject.otherPercutaneous electrolysises_ES
dc.subject.otherTrigger point dry needlinges_ES
dc.subject.otherShoulder paines_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5caa295d-5e0c-47f7-97bd-a7e384cd66a9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5caa295d-5e0c-47f7-97bd-a7e384cd66a9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy 2020 jcm.pdf
Size:
1.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Articulo Publicado version con DOI
Download

Description: Articulo Publicado version con DOI

Collections