Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model. A Three-Fold-Model
Loading...
Files
Description: Artículo Principal Publicado
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Authors
Ramírez Calle, Olga
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Society for the Advancement of Philosophy (Croatia)
Share
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to propose an alternative model to realist and non-cognitive explanations of the rule-guided use of thick ethical concepts and to examine the implications that may be drawn from this and similar cases for our general understanding of rule-following and the relation between criteria of ap- plication, truth and correctness. It addresses McDowell’s non-cognitivism critique and challenges his defence of the entanglement thesis for thick ethical concepts. Contrary to non-cognitivists, however, I propose to view the relation between the two terms of the entanglement as resulting from the satisfaction of a previ- ously applied moral function. This is what I call a “Three-Fold Model”.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Ramírez Calle, O. (2011) “Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model”. 10 (1), pp. 101 - 112. Zagreb (Croacia): Society for the Advancement of Philosophy, Zagreb Croatia, 19/03/2011.
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced by
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 Internacional







