Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model. A Three-Fold-Model

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Identifiers

Publication date

Reading date

Authors

Ramírez Calle, Olga

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Society for the Advancement of Philosophy (Croatia)

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Department/Institute

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to propose an alternative model to realist and non-cognitive explanations of the rule-guided use of thick ethical concepts and to examine the implications that may be drawn from this and similar cases for our general understanding of rule-following and the relation between criteria of ap- plication, truth and correctness. It addresses McDowell’s non-cognitivism critique and challenges his defence of the entanglement thesis for thick ethical concepts. Contrary to non-cognitivists, however, I propose to view the relation between the two terms of the entanglement as resulting from the satisfaction of a previ- ously applied moral function. This is what I call a “Three-Fold Model”.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Ramírez Calle, O. (2011) “Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model”. 10 (1), pp. 101 - 112. Zagreb (Croacia): Society for the Advancement of Philosophy, Zagreb Croatia, 19/03/2011.

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 Internacional