Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model. A Three-Fold-Model
Loading...
Files
Description: Artículo Principal Publicado
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Authors
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Society for the Advancement of Philosophy (Croatia)
Share
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to propose an alternative model to realist and non-cognitive explanations of the rule-guided use of thick ethical concepts and to examine the implications that may be drawn from this and similar cases for our general understanding of rule-following and the relation between criteria of ap- plication, truth and correctness. It addresses McDowell’s non-cognitivism critique and challenges his defence of the entanglement thesis for thick ethical concepts. Contrary to non-cognitivists, however, I propose to view the relation between the two terms of the entanglement as resulting from the satisfaction of a previ- ously applied moral function. This is what I call a “Three-Fold Model”.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Ramírez Calle, O. (2011) “Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model”. 10 (1), pp. 101 - 112. Zagreb (Croacia): Society for the Advancement of Philosophy, Zagreb Croatia, 19/03/2011.
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced by
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 Internacional







