Clays for Low-Carbon Cements: Overview, Progress, and Challenges

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias
dc.contributor.authorKoufany, Imane
dc.contributor.authorSantacruz-Cruz, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGómez-de-la-Torre, María de los Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Ruiz, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Aranda, Miguel Ángel
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T12:32:35Z
dc.date.issued2026-01
dc.departamentoQuímica Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralografía
dc.description.abstractThe replacement of Portland clinker with supplementary cementitious materials is a key approach to reducing the embodied carbon content of concretes. In this context, a widely studied family is the “limestone calcined clay cements, LC3 .”Within this eco-friendly family of materials, one composition is gaining popularity, LC3 -50, a blend of ~50% of Portland clinker, 30% of activated clay, 15% of limestone and 5% of gypsum. This interest is due to a ~40% reduction of CO2 emissions compared to Portland clinker, together with high compressive strengths after 7 days and very good durability against chloride and sulfate attacks. However, limitations still exist, such as low strengths at 1 day, workability loss during the first 2 h and reduced carbonation resistance. These drawbacks are being overcome with tailored admixtures and curing approaches. Here, after introducing low-carbon cements, pozzolans, and pozzolanic reactions, as well as phyllosilicate minerals, attention is given to recent progress in thermal and mechanical, aka mechanochemical, activations. Then, general correlations are established to assist in predicting compressive strength. This work concludes by highlighting the challenges that must be overcome for the widespread adoption of these classic rocks processed to yield advanced materials with the highest possible pozzolanic reactivity.
dc.identifier.citationI. Koufany, I. Santacruz, A. G. De la Torre, M. D. Rodríguez-Ruiz, and M. A. G. Aranda, “ Clays for Low-Carbon Cements: Overview, Progress, and Challenges.” Global Challenges 10, no. 1 (2026): e00496. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202500496
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/gch2.202500496
dc.identifier.issn2056-6646
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/45076
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.projectIDPID2020-114650RB-I00 and PID2024- 161797OB-I00 grants (Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Spain, co- funded by ERDF)
dc.relation.projectID101139298 grant, acronym: syn4cem (European Union, call ERC-AdG)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHormigón
dc.subjectCemento
dc.subject.otherArtificial pozzolans
dc.subject.otherCompressive strengths
dc.subject.otherLow CO2 footprint
dc.subject.otherMechanical activation
dc.subject.otherThermal activation
dc.subject.otherR3 test
dc.titleClays for Low-Carbon Cements: Overview, Progress, and Challenges
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b040537-c836-4758-ab97-e10f6e2f7ec8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication341d3e45-19c6-44b5-bcb5-bdb3fc4c1a67
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3fc44758-2872-4d81-9da0-11fbe1b0c1a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf3263929-fd93-474c-a26e-b808a4972a23
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b040537-c836-4758-ab97-e10f6e2f7ec8

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2026_Global Challenges_Clays for Low‐Carbon Cements Overview Progress and Challenges.pdf
Size:
5.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections