Variability in the clinical diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorChicharro-Luna, Esther
dc.contributor.authorPomares-Gómez, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Ávila, Ana Belén
dc.contributor.authorCoheña-Jiménez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGijón-Noguerón, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-03T10:34:58Z
dc.date.available2025-04-03T10:34:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-14
dc.departamentoEnfermeríaes_ES
dc.descriptionhttps://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/id/publication/16932es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study are to assess the variability in the prevalence of diabeticperipheral neuropathy (DPN), according to the diagnostic and clinical guidelines used.Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted of 111 patients with diabetesmellitus. The presence/absence of DPN was determined according to 12 different criteriastipulated in various clinical guidelines (ADA 2018, IWGDF 2016, IDF 2012 and CONUEI 2018).The Cohen’s kappa coefficient ( ) was performed to determine the degree of agreement forDPN diagnosis among the different criteria.Results: The recorded prevalence of DPN ranged from 13.1% (criterion ADA 2018) to 68.5%(criterion IDF 2012). The sensory parameter that was most commonly affected was the non-perception of vibration (68.5%) and the absence of Achilles reflexes (59.4%). IWGDF, based onthe use of a monofilament, cotton wisp and tuning fork, was the test with more agreements,presenting good agreement with 2 criteria from ADA 2018 (k = 0.845), 1b2 (k = 0.817), 2 criteriafrom IWGDF 2016 (k = 0.933), (k = 0.817), 1 criteria from IDF 2012 (k = 0.845) and 1 criteria fromCONUEI 2018 (k = 0.860), all p < 0.001.Conclusion: The IWGDF criterion based on the use of a monofilament, cotton wisp and tuningfork for the diagnosis presented the highest level of concordance with the other criteria(>0.8).es_ES
dc.identifier.citationChicharro-Luna E, Pomares-Gómez FJ, Ortega-Ávila AB, Coheña-Jiménez M, Gijon-Nogueron G. Variability in the clinical diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Feb;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 14. PMID: 31208891.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/38357
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectNeuropatía diabéticaes_ES
dc.subjectPieses_ES
dc.subjectDiabetes - Complicaciones y secuelases_ES
dc.subjectAtención primariaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDiabetic neuropathieses_ES
dc.subject.otherFoot diabetices_ES
dc.subject.otherDiabetes complicationses_ES
dc.subject.otherPrimary carees_ES
dc.subject.otherNeuropathy screeninges_ES
dc.titleVariability in the clinical diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionSMURes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0f231f4d-baaf-40e3-a2d7-1f45aeadb7d0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3ffc8107-a9ac-4645-84d9-6b13cad51fc8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0f231f4d-baaf-40e3-a2d7-1f45aeadb7d0

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Investigacion_Publicaciones_Variability in the clinical diagnosis (1).pdf
Size:
680.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections