Dataset for Repeated Measures ANOVA and Adjusted F-Tests When Sphericity is Violated: Which Procedure is Best?

Thumbnail Image

Files

Readme.txt (453 B)
 Tables._Repeated_measures_ANOVA_and_adjusted_F-tests_when_spherici_B4VA92o.pdf (2.6 MB)

Identifiers

URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10630/31461
DOI: 10.24310/riuma.31461

Publication date

2024-05-31

Reading date

Authors

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Universidad de Málaga

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Center

Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia

Department/Institute

Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento

Referenced by

Blanca, M. J., Arnau, J., García-Castro, F. J., Alarcón, R., & Bono, R. (2023). Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted F-tests when sphericity is violated: which procedure is best? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1192453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192453

Keywords

Psicología - Investigación
Análisis de varianza

Abstract

Tables correspond to the performance of the F-statistic, and of F adjusted by the Greenhouse-Geisser (F-GG) and Huyhn-Feldt (F-HF) procedures in terms of Type I error and power in repeated measures designs with normal data. Values of epsilon are fixed according to the Greenhouse–Geisser procedure. The number of repeated measures (3, 4, and 6), sample size (from 10 to 300), and epsilon values (from the lower to its upper limit) were manipulated.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Collections

Datos de Investigación

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by

Creative Commons license

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internacional