Unmanned Aircraft Systems complement biologging in spatial ecology studies
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Authors
Mulero-Pázmány, Margarita Cristina
Barasona, José-Ángel
Acevedo, Pelayo
Vicente, Joaquín
Negro, Juan-José
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons (Ecology and Evolution)
Share
Center
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
The knowledge about the spatial ecology and distribution of organisms is important for both basic and applied science. Biologging is one of the most popular methods for obtaining information about spatial distribution of animals, but requires capturing the animals and is often limited by costs and data retrieval. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) have proven their efficacy for wildlife surveillance and habitat monitoring, but their potential contribution to the prediction of animal distribution patterns and abundance has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we assess the usefulness of UAS overflights to (1) get data to model the distribution of free-ranging cattle for a comparison with results obtained from biologged (GPS-GSM collared) cattle and (2) predict species densities for a comparison with actual density in a protected area. UAS and biologging derived data models provided similar distribution patterns. Predictions from the UAS model overestimated cattle densities, which may be associated with higher aggregated distributions of this species. Overall, while the particular researcher interests and species characteristics will influence the method of choice for each study, we demonstrate here that UAS constitute a noninvasive methodology able to provide accurate spatial data useful for ecological research, wildlife management and rangeland planning.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Mulero-Pázmány M., Barasona J.A., Acevedo P., Vicente J., Negro J.J. (2015). Unmanned Aircraft Systems complement biologging in spatial ecology studies. Ecology and Evolution 5 (21): 4808–4818. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1744 JCR






