Education, power, and segregation. The psychoeducational report as an obstacle to inclusive education.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Reading date

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This article is the result of research carried out by a group of activists who advocate for the rights of children with disabilities. They are exploring new approaches to both school counselling and the fight against segregation in order to improve the situation of children in the Spanish education system. It focuses on how the psychoeducational report is a key tool for legitimising school segregation, and how deconstructing it is essential for building inclusive schools. The data analysed were collected from 100 people from all over Spain who took part in a Participatory Action Research project focused on emerging narratives on inclusive schooling. The aim of the project was to gather accounts of the experiences of pupils, families, and activist professionals who are engaged in a determined struggle to make schools inclusive. Participants were able to share their experiences, conduct their analysis through assemblies and cooperative groups, and use networking to transform existing policies, cultures, and practices. The information obtained indicates that the labels used by current psychoeducational reports are based on a clinical model and are focused on children’s deficiencies. They provide limited knowledge about the individuals involved and exercise strong social and symbolic control over them and others.

Description

https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/id/publication/5411

Bibliographic citation

Calderón-Almendros, I., Moreno-Parra, J. J., & Vila-Merino, E. S. (2024). Education, power, and segregation. The psychoeducational report as an obstacle to inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(11), 2424–2437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2108512

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional