Copper in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Bravo, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMarín-Burdallo, Inés
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Herrera, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Palacios Torres, Carla
dc.contributor.authorLozano-Lorca, Macarena
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Moleón, José Juan
dc.contributor.authorOlmedo-Requena, Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-06T10:59:55Z
dc.date.available2025-06-06T10:59:55Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-23
dc.departamentoSalud Pública y Psiquiatríaes_ES
dc.description.abstractSeveral clinical studies have evaluated the relationship between copper on colorectal cancer (CRC), but the results are contradictory. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate copper measured in two biological matrices (serum/plasma/blood and tissue) and dietary intake in CRC patients compared to healthy controls. We conducted a comprehensive and systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. We included studies that reported copper levels in serum/plasma/blood, tissue, or from the diet, with an observational study design (cohort and case–control studies). Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and potential causes of heterogeneity were evaluated. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using random-effect models. Overall pooled odds ratio and 95% CI for the risk of CRC were calculated. Twenty-six studies (23 case–control and 3 cohort studies) with a total of 227 354 participants were included. Most of the studies presented low (50%) or moderate quality (42.3%). No differences in serum/plasma/blood copper levels (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI: −0.23, 0.70; I2 = 97.3%, 19 studies), tissue copper levels (SMD = −1.69; 95% CI: −3.41, 0.03; I2 = 85.6%, 2 studies), or copper/zinc ratio (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.84; I2 = 95.3%, 6 studies) were found between CRC patients and healthy controls. Regarding dietary copper, CRC patients had a lower intake (SMD = −0.27; 95% CI: −0.51, −0.03; I2 = 0.0%, 2 studies). No differences were found in copper levels between CRC patients and healthy controls. However, evidence shows mostly low or moderate quality, and results were heterogeneous. More prospective studies with an adequate methodological approach are needed.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz-Bravo C, Marín-Burdallo I, González-Herrera L, González-Palacios Torres C, Lozano-Lorca M, Jiménez-Moleón JJ, et al. Copper in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2025 Jan 1;46(1).es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/carcin/bgaf001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/38926
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectColon (Anatomía) - Cánceres_ES
dc.subjectRevisiones sistemáticas (Medicina)es_ES
dc.subjectMeta-análisises_ES
dc.subjectCarcinógenoses_ES
dc.subjectCobre en el organismoes_ES
dc.subject.otherCopperes_ES
dc.subject.otherCopper/zinc ratioes_ES
dc.subject.otherColorectal canceres_ES
dc.subject.otherCanceres_ES
dc.subject.otherMeta-analysises_ES
dc.titleCopper in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication485b7528-3f99-4ad4-b8ff-4880e0667099
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery485b7528-3f99-4ad4-b8ff-4880e0667099

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Carcinogénesis, 2025.pdf
Size:
1.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections