The views of birth families regarding access visits in foster care.
Loading...
Files
Description: Artículo principal
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE
Share
Department/Institute
Abstract
Summary: This study aims to give voice to parents and gather their views about
contact visits in foster care. Participants were 23 birth families who had contact visits
with 35 children in non-kinship foster care. Semistructured individual interviews were
conducted in order to explore two key aspects: the parents’ opinions regarding the
contact visits and the main areas they felt needed improving. The interviews were
transcribed and the transcripts were examined using an inductive method by Atlas.ti.
Findings: The main themes to emerge concerned their general view of contact visits,
the input and support from social workers, the contribution of foster families, the
contact venue, and the organization of visits. In general, the birth families’ comments
were positive about the support and treatment received from social workers. However,
they also mentioned certain aspects should be improved, such as supervision during
visits.
Applications: The results suggest several ways to improve social work practice. Social
workers should aim to involve birth families more in the process of drawing up contact
arrangements and offering birth families adequate preparation prior to visits. Child
protection agencies also have a role to play in relation to improving the facilities in which visits are held, as well as their overall organization, such as, the venue should
provide a space that enables everyday family relationships to take place, and in the
absence of this, attempts should be made to organize visits outside the official meeting
place.
Description
Bibliographic citation
García-Martín, M. Á., Fuentes, M. J., Bernedo, I. M., & Salas, M. D. (2019). The views of birth families regarding access visits in foster care. Journal of Social Work, 19(2), 173-191.











