Comparative assessment of different methods for using land-cover variables for distribution modelling of Salamandra salamandra longirotris

dc.centroFacultad de Cienciases_ES
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Pacheco, David
dc.contributor.authorOlivero-Anarte, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorReal-Giménez, Raimundo
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-28T16:50:50Z
dc.date.available2024-09-28T16:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-16
dc.departamentoBiología Animal
dc.descriptionhttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/1566es_ES
dc.description.abstractPredictive models are frequently used to define the most suitable areas for species protection or reintroduction. Land-cover variables can be used in different ways for distribution modelling. The surface area of a set of land-cover classes is often used, each land-cover presence/absence or the distance to them from any point of the study area can be preferred; multiple types of landcover variables may be combined to produce a single model. This paper assesses whether different approaches to using land-cover variables may lead to different ecological conclusions when interpreted for conservation by focusing on the distribution of the salamader Salamandra salamandra longirostris, an endangered amphibian subspecies in the south of the Iberian Peninsula. Twenty-eight land-cover classes and another 42 environmental variables were used to construct four different models. Three models used a unique type of land-cover variable: either the presence of each class, the surface area of each class or the distance to each class, with all three variable types jointly entered in a fourth model. All models attained acceptable scores according to some criteria (discrimination, descriptive and predictive capacities, classification accuracy and parsimony); however most of the assessment parameters computed indicated a better performance of the models using either the surface area of land classes or the distance to them from every sampled square, compared to the model using class presences. The best scores were obtained with the fourthmodel, which combined different types of land-cover variables. Thismodel suggested that oak forest fragmentation in favour of herbaceous crops and pastures may have negative effects on the distribution of S. s. longirostris. This was only partially suggested by the first threemodels, which considered a single type of land-cover variable, demonstrating the importance of considering a multi-variable analysis for conservation planning.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipD. Romero was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación: AP2007-03633. This study was partially supported by project CGL2009-11316 of the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, and the European Commission under the HUNT project of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRomero, D., Olivero, J., & Real, R. (2012). Comparative assessment of different methods for using land-cover variables for distribution modelling of Salamandra salamandra longirostris. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 48–59.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0376892912000227
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/33855
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCambridge University Presses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSalamandras - Distribución geográfica - Modelos matemáticoses_ES
dc.subject.otherClass presencees_ES
dc.subject.otherClass surface areaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDistance to classes_ES
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental favourability modelses_ES
dc.subject.otherHabitat fragmentationes_ES
dc.subject.otherLand-cover variableses_ES
dc.titleComparative assessment of different methods for using land-cover variables for distribution modelling of Salamandra salamandra longirotrises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8ad40c18-edb7-41fd-b70e-e5e8ce87b5e6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6953b4c5-9a05-45ec-bb0b-05469790c5db
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9779d41e-c7c7-493f-a39c-9aee48cba2d7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8ad40c18-edb7-41fd-b70e-e5e8ce87b5e6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RomeroD2012_Comparative salamandra EC1110220_postprint.pdf
Size:
594.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections