Replication Data for: Heterogeneity in General Multinomial Choice Models.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

readme.txt (2.41 KB)

Description: readme file

Replication.R (23.28 KB)

Description: Command file R

GHMNL.R (23.26 KB)

Description: R function

Data.RDS (147.1 KB)

Description: Dataset

Identifiers

Publication date

Reading date

Authors

Mauerer, Ingrid Doris
Tutz, Gerhard

Collaborators

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Harvard Dataverse

Metrics

Google Scholar

Share

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Department/Institute

Referenced by

Mauerer, I. & Tutz, G. (2023). "Heterogeneity in General Multinomial Choice Models." Statistical Methods & Applications 32(1): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-022-00642-5

Abstract

Different voters behave differently at the polls, different students make different university choices, or different countries choose different health care systems. Many research questions important to social scientists concern choice behavior, which involves dealing with nominal dependent variables. Drawing on the principle of maximum random utility, we propose applying a flexible and general heterogeneous multinomial logit model to study differences in choice behavior. The model systematically accounts for heterogeneity that classical models do not capture, indicates the strength of heterogeneity, and permits examining which explanatory variables cause heterogeneity. As the proposed approach allows incorporating theoretical expectations about heterogeneity into the analysis of nominal dependent variables, it can be applied to a wide range of research problems. Our empirical example uses individual-level survey data to demonstrate the benefits of the model in studying heterogeneity in electoral decisions.

Description

The files contain the commands to run the models and create the tables in Mauerer, I. & Tutz, G. (2023). "Heterogeneity in General Multinomial Choice Models." Statistical Methods & Applications 32(1): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-022-00642-5

Bibliographic citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced by