Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample

dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorNeblett, Randy
dc.contributor.authorChiarotto, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorKregel, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorNijs, Jo
dc.contributor.authorvan Wilgen, C Paul
dc.contributor.authorPitance, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorKnezevic, Aleksandar
dc.contributor.authorGatchel, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Tom G
dc.contributor.authorViti, Carlotta
dc.contributor.authorRoldán-Jiménez, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorTesta, Marco
dc.contributor.authorCaumo, Wolnei
dc.contributor.authorJeremic-Knezevic, Milica
dc.contributor.authorLuciano, Juan V
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-16T12:56:55Z
dc.date.available2024-12-16T12:56:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractCentral sensitization (CS) involves the amplification of neural signaling within the central nervous system, which evokes pain hypersensitivity. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) assesses 25 overlapping health-related symptom dimensions that have been reported to be associated with CS-related disorders. Previous studies have reported satisfactory test-retest reliability and internal consistency, but factor analyses have exhibited conflicting results in different language versions. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to thoroughly examine the dimensionality and reliability of the CSI, with pooled data from 1,987 individuals, collected in several countries. The principal component analysis suggested that 1 general factor of CS best described the structure. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a bifactor model, which accounted for the covariance among CSI items, with regard to 1 general factor and 4 orthogonal factors, fit the CSI structure better than the unidimensional and the 4-factor models. Additional analyses indicated substantial reliability for the general factor (ie, Cronbach α = .92; ω = .95; and ω hierarchical = .89). Reliability results for the 4 specific factors were considered too low to be used for subscales. The results of this study clearly suggest that only total CSI scores should be used and reported.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCuesta-Vargas AI, Neblett R, Chiarotto A, Kregel J, Nijs J, van Wilgen CP, Pitance L, Knezevic A, Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Viti C, Roldan-Jiménez C, Testa M, Caumo W, Jeremic-Knezevic M, Luciano JV. Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample. J Pain. 2018 Mar;19(3):317-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 2. PMID: 29198933es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/35696
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJ Paines_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectDolores_ES
dc.subject.otherCentral Sensitization Inventoryes_ES
dc.subject.otherCentral sensitivity syndromees_ES
dc.subject.otherChronic paines_ES
dc.subject.otherPsychometricses_ES
dc.subject.otherCentral sensitizationes_ES
dc.subject.otherMulticountry samplees_ES
dc.titleDimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Samplees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationae123d5b-4c17-4d63-9708-e83f8477984a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018 Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample.pdf
Size:
602.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections