Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Cruzado, David Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Sánchez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-14T09:09:48Z
dc.date.available2025-02-14T09:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-30
dc.departamentoFisioterapia
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: There are no published studies on the parameterisation and reliability of the single-leg stance (SLS) test with inertial sensors in stroke patients. Purpose: to analyse the reliability (intra-observer/inter-observer) and sensitivity of inertial sensors used for the SLS test in stroke patients. Secondary objective: to compare the records of the two inertial sensors (trunk and lumbar) to detect any significant differences in the kinematic data obtained in the SLS test. Methods: Design: cross-sectional study. While performing the SLS test, two inertial sensors were placed at lumbar (L5-S1) and trunk regions (T7-T8). Setting: Laboratory of Biomechanics (Health Science Faculty - University of Málaga). Participants: Four chronic stroke survivors (over 65 yrs old). Measurement: displacement and velocity, Rotation (X-axis), Flexion/Extension (Y-axis), Inclination (Z-axis); Resultant displacement and velocity (V): RV = √Vx2+Vy2+Vz2. Along with SLS kinematic variables, descriptive analyses, differences between sensors locations and intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were also calculated. Results: Differences between the sensors were significant only for left inclination velocity (p = 0.036) and extension displacement in the non-affected leg with eyes open (p = 0.038). Intra-observer reliability of the trunk sensor ranged from 0.889-0.921 for the displacement and 0.849-0.892 for velocity. Intra-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor was between 0.896-0.949 for the displacement and 0.873-0.894 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the trunk sensor was between 0.878-0.917 for the displacement and 0.847-0.884 for velocity. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the kinematic records made by an inertial sensor during the development of the SLS testing between two inertial sensors placed in the lumbar and thoracic regions. In addition, inertial sensors.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationPerez-Cruzado D, González-Sánchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study. Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Aug 30;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-127. PMID: 25174611; PMCID: PMC4158088.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-925X-13-127
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/37868
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMC Springer Naturees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectEnfermos cerebrovasculareses_ES
dc.subjectEquilibrio (Fisiología)es_ES
dc.subject.otherReliabilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherInertial sensores_ES
dc.subject.otherStrokees_ES
dc.subject.otherSingle-leg stance testes_ES
dc.subject.otherBalancees_ES
dc.titleParameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication636ed082-6d1a-4c86-abe1-5a1dc630a6a7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd1d67599-b8c6-4fc4-834d-eeeae4eef078
relation.isAuthorOfPublication94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery636ed082-6d1a-4c86-abe1-5a1dc630a6a7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2014 Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors a cross-sectional study.pdf
Size:
717.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections