<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-05T12:51:12Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12243" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12243</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T12:18:42Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37959</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12243">
      <dc:title>The European Union and new dimensions of citizenship</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Postigo-Asenjo, Marta</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Ciudadanía</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Unión Europea</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>The European integration process raises interesting challenges to the conceptualization&#xd;
and the exercise of citizenship in a multinational cosmopolitan context. Certainly, the&#xd;
current institutional architecture of the European Union (EU) faces tough criticism. On&#xd;
the one hand, anti-European parties and Euro-skeptics, by means of Euro-exit initiatives&#xd;
and on nationalist grounds, challenge the very existence of the European integration&#xd;
project. On the other hand, federalist and pro-European intellectuals often complain that&#xd;
the EU has not gone far enough with respect to the democratic, the civic and/or the&#xd;
social integration of the Union.&#xd;
In spite of such criticism, the European integration process has given rise to a novel and&#xd;
singular form of citizenship: the so-called dual form of citizenship. The European dual&#xd;
form of citizenship entails a combination of national and supranational civic&#xd;
membership. EU citizenship –which is automatically conferred on every EU citizen by&#xd;
the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU–, does not replace, but complements national&#xd;
citizenship. In this regard, it implies the automatic expansion and improvement of&#xd;
citizens’ rights and opportunities –for example, the right to vote and stand as a&#xd;
candidate in municipal and European Parliament elections and the right to move and&#xd;
reside freely within the EU–. Moreover, EU treaties (now including the Chapter of&#xd;
Fundamental Rights of the EU, legally binding on the supranational institutions and on&#xd;
national governments since 1 December 2009) and institutions such as the Court of&#xd;
Justice of the European Union, contribute to the enhancement of the legal and judicial&#xd;
mechanisms for the protection of basic rights.&#xd;
In spite of these benefits and achievements, the democratic shortcomings of the EU’s&#xd;
decision-making architecture encourage citizens’ distrust of the EU. In addition, one&#xd;
basic goal and achievement of the European integration project, which is citizens’&#xd;
mobility within the EU, is facing serious setbacks. Indeed, the Schengen Agreements&#xd;
allow for exceptions which are too easily employed by the member states in order&#xd;
strengthen their borders controls and restrict intra-European mobility; which has just&#xd;
intensified as a consequence of the economic crisis, and more recently, the “refugees&#xd;
crisis”.&#xd;
The focus of my paper is on the conceptual challenge that the European integration&#xd;
project raises to the modern idea of citizenship. One of the basic conditions for the&#xd;
exercise of the democratic citizenship has traditionally been national membership. Yet,&#xd;
this has just been challenged by the European integration process and the dual form of&#xd;
citizenship that it has guaranteed. In Section 08, of the ECPR General Conference, I&#xd;
would like to address the conceptual implications of EU citizenship.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2016-10-19T09:08:54Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016-10-19T09:08:54Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016-10-19</dc:date>
      <dc:type>conference output</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10630/12243</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>ECPR General Conference</dc:relation>
      <dc:relation>Praga, República Checa</dc:relation>
      <dc:relation>Septiembre 2016</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>