<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T17:01:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12602" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12602</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T12:01:22Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37959</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/12602">
      <dc:title>The educational role of evaluation: formative and shared evaluation in the university field</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Alba-Dorado, María Isabel</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Enseñanza superior</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Nowadays, we have a scenario marked by an increasingly complex and time-consuming formative&#xd;
model, which differs considerably from that which has been used until now. This raises the need to&#xd;
rethink, review and reconsider the teaching and learning model of today's universities with the aim of&#xd;
designing a new educational model that responds to the new emerging training needs that early&#xd;
twenty-first century society demands.&#xd;
These changes in the training model make it necessary to rethink the existing evaluation processes,&#xd;
which are going to be affected by strong changes. They are determined not only by the passage of the&#xd;
traditional emphasis put on the teacher and the education, to the importance that is given today to the&#xd;
lea rning and to the student as the centre of this learning process; but it also changes the purpose of&#xd;
evaluation, moving from the acquisition of a series of academic knowledge to the development of skills&#xd;
and gaining basic and more complex applied knowledge; but above all, it changes the role that&#xd;
evaluation has in improving these learning processes.&#xd;
The usefulness of the evaluation is not only in the ability that it gives us to verify the final performance&#xd;
of the student's learning, but that it should also serve as a training element, which is integrated into the&#xd;
teaching and learning processes from start to finish. Thus, the evaluation should serve not only to&#xd;
assess whether the student has assimilated knowledge, but also to guide their learning.&#xd;
This in-depth review of the evaluation process also involves thinking about the method and the actors&#xd;
involved in this process. So, against the punitive nature of traditional assessment carried out by the&#xd;
teacher who evaluates a group of students in an exercise of authority, it is necessary to think of&#xd;
alternatives that involve and engage students in their own evaluation process and, therefore, in their&#xd;
own training in order to achieve a lasting learning that will serve them throughout life.&#xd;
In this new evaluation model, the actor who assesses is not only the teacher, but all those involved&#xd;
have a responsibility to participate in the evaluation and self-assessment activities. In this way,&#xd;
evaluating is a shared responsibility, in which neither the teaching nor the learning are stopped. The&#xd;
student must participate in all activities to keep learning.&#xd;
Thus, the evaluation should be understood as a formative and shared activity between teachers and&#xd;
students. This will allow us to definitively know whether or not the teaching objectives, methodology&#xd;
used, resources, assessment, etc. are responding as expected or whether they have to be changed in&#xd;
time to get closer to the fixed goals. All this leads us to consider and to take into account in the&#xd;
process of teaching and learning not only the more technical aspect of evaluation, but also its more&#xd;
human, critical, reflective, formative and negotiating dimension.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2016-12-19T12:12:12Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016-12-19T12:12:12Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
      <dc:type>conference output</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10630/12602</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>ICERI 2016. 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation</dc:relation>
      <dc:relation>Sevilla</dc:relation>
      <dc:relation>14 Noviembre, 2016</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>IATED</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>