<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-28T16:22:22Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/18087" metadataPrefix="mods">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/18087</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T12:12:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37959</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Toscano-Méndez, Manuel</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2019-07-19T07:38:44Z</mods:dateAvailable>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2019-07-19T07:38:44Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2019-07-19</mods:dateIssued>
   </mods:originInfo>
   <mods:identifier type="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10630/18087</mods:identifier>
   <mods:abstract>In the events of September and October of 2017 in Catalonia many voices argued that&#xd;
voting and democracy should be above the rule of law and the Constitution. The&#xd;
supporters of the independence of Catalonia thus established an opposition between the&#xd;
rule of law and the Constitution, on the one hand, and the democratic principle, on the&#xd;
other. In this talk I want to examine briefly if this opposition can be sustained and if it&#xd;
does not rest on mistaken assumptions or confusions about the rule of law, the sense of&#xd;
the Constitution and the very idea of democracy.&#xd;
In the first place, I would like to frame this opposition in the current diagnoses about&#xd;
what some authors have called ‘the populist moment’. Populism makes sense as a&#xd;
manifestation of the crisis of liberal democracy. So the same expression of the&#xd;
opposition between democracy and liberal constitutionalism, as some political actors&#xd;
claim, should be understood as a significant symptom of the crisis of liberal democracy&#xd;
nowadays. Is it possible to think of an illiberal democracy? This would amount to a&#xd;
democracy without the institutions of the rule of law or constitutional safeguards.&#xd;
In the second part of the talk, I will consider the arguments presented in the famous&#xd;
ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada on the question of the secession of Quebec&#xd;
(1998). The sentence offers an incisive and highly relevant examination of the&#xd;
principles inspiring a democratic constitutional regime. I will dwell on the analysis of&#xd;
democracy and the constitutionalism principle since it allows us to examine closely how&#xd;
they relate. As the Canadian judges conclude, it is not possible to understand democracy&#xd;
apart from the rule of law and constitutionalism nor as being above them.</mods:abstract>
   <mods:language>
      <mods:languageTerm>spa</mods:languageTerm>
   </mods:language>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">open access</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:subject>
      <mods:topic>Constitucionalismo</mods:topic>
   </mods:subject>
   <mods:subject>
      <mods:topic>Democracia</mods:topic>
   </mods:subject>
   <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>Imperio de la ley, constitucionalismo y democracia</mods:title>
   </mods:titleInfo>
   <mods:genre>conference output</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>