2026-06-06T02:14:54Zhttps://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request

oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/198662026-02-03T11:31:05Zcom_10630_2254col_10630_37953

Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo Yuste-Ginel, Antonio 2020-10-01T08:56:07Z 2020-10-01T08:56:07Z 2020-09-04 Burrieza A, Yuste-Ginel A. Basic beliefs and argument-based beliefs in awareness epistemic logic with structured arguments. In: H. Prakken et al. (eds). Proceedings of the COMMA 2020. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press; 2010. . https://hdl.handle.net/10630/19866 10.3233/FAIA200498 There are two intuitive principles governing belief formation and argument evaluation that can potentially clash. After arguing that adopting them unrestrictedly leads to an infinite regress, we propose a formal framework in which qualified versions of both principles can be subscribed without falling into such a regress. The proposal integrates tools from two different traditions: structured argumentation and awareness epistemic logic. We show that our formalism satisfies certain rationality postulates and argue that the rest of them can be seen as too ideal when modelling resource-bounded agents. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ open access Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional Lógica epistémica Conciencia Creencia y duda Basic Beliefs and Argument-based Beliefs in Awareness Epistemic Logic with Structured Arguments journal article