<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T12:20:41Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/23213" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/23213</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:57:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37959</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
   <leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="042">
      <subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Sanchez-Mancera, J.</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Camas-Peña, Daniel</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Prates, P.A.</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="720">
      <subfield code="a">Antunes, Fernando Ventura</subfield>
      <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="260">
      <subfield code="c">2021</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2=" " ind1=" " tag="520">
      <subfield code="a">The Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) is an elastic-plastic fracture mechanics parameter usually employed as a measurement of fracture toughness and to explain the fatigue crack growth. This parameter can be decomposed on two different components: the elastic and plastic one. The plastic component is responsible for the degradation of the material while the elastic component is only affecting to the atomic spacing. Lately, the plastic CTOD rage has been considered to study fatigue crack propagation instead of the classical ΔK elastic parameter. In this study, the influence of the mesh size on plastic CTOD results is analysed. For this purpose, a titanium CT specimen is modelled bi-dimensionally using the finite element method. Plane stress conditions are considered. Results are analysed at different places near the crack tip.</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
      <subfield code="a">https://hdl.handle.net/10630/23213</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield tag="653" ind2=" " ind1=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Materiales - Fatiga</subfield>
   </datafield>
   <datafield ind2="0" ind1="0" tag="245">
      <subfield code="a">Influence of the mesh size on plastic CTOD</subfield>
   </datafield>
</record>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>