2026-05-31T01:08:44Zhttps://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request

oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/278712026-02-03T10:56:12Zcom_10630_2254col_10630_37953

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Alabau-Dasi, Raquel author Domínguez-Maldonado, Gabriel author Gijón-Noguerón, Gabriel author Ortega-Ávila, Ana Belén author Delacroix, Sebastian author 2023-09-14 Objective: the aim of this study is to observe whether there are ultrasound changes between men and women in the Achilles tendon at rest, at maximum passive force is applied and during walking. Material and methods: it was a cross-sectional study involving 27 healthy young participants recruited as vol-unteers between April to July 2022. A variety of data was recorded: (age, Body Mass Index, sex, smoking, current injury status, allergies, medications, previous surgeries, type of sport, and number of weekly workouts) and ultrasound measurements at rest and at passive force (Cross Sectional Area Achilles Tendon length, tendon thickness, Cross Sectional Area and pennation angle of the soleus muscle to the Achilles Tendon). Results: women demonstrated a statistically significant lower proximal and median thickness both at rest (4.5 vs 5.1 mm with p < 0.001 for proximal thickness; 4.4 vs 5.3 mm with p < 0.001 for median thickness) as well as during maximum eccentric contraction (4.3 vs 4.8 mm with p=<0.001 for proximal thickness; 4.1 vs 4.8 mm with p < 0.001 for median thickness). Conclusion: there are significant sonoanatomical differences in vivo Achilles tendon between men and women. Alabau-Dasi R, Dominguez-Maldonado G, Gijon-Nogueron G, Ortega-Avila AB, Delacroix S. How susceptible are our Achilles Tendons? Sonoanatomical assessment. A cross-sectional study. J Tissue Viability. 2023 Nov;32(4):572-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.09.002 https://hdl.handle.net/10630/27871 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.09.002 Aquiles, Tendón de Ultrasonidos en medicina How susceptible are our Achilles Tendons? Sonoanatomical assessment. A cross-sectional study