<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-03T23:23:09Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/30267" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/30267</identifier><datestamp>2026-03-23T09:13:22Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/30267">
      <dc:title>Is it possible to diagnose the therapeutic adherence of patients with COPD in clinical practice? A cohort study.</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Leiva-Fernández, José</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Vidal-España, Francisca</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>García-Ruiz, Antonio J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Prados Torres, Daniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Prados-Torres, Francisca</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Pulmones - Enfermedades</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Pulmones - Tratamiento</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica - Terapéutica</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Medicamentos - Consumo</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>The purpose of this study was to analyse the diagnostic validity of indirect adherence methods.&#xd;
Methods: Sample: 195 COPD patients undergoing scheduled inhaled treatment attending 5 Primary Care Centres of Malaga, Spain. Variables: Sociodemographic profile, illness data, spirometry, quality of life (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire: SGRQ), and inhaled medication counting (count of dose/pill or electronic monitoring) were collected. The patient’s knowledge of COPD (Batalla test:BT),their attitude towards treatment (Morisky-Green test: MGT) and their self-reported therapeutic adherence (Haynes-Sackett test: HST) were used as methods of evaluating adherence. The follow-up consisted four visits over one year (the recruitment visit: V0; and after 1 month:V1; 6 months:V2; and 1 year:V3).&#xd;
Results: The mean age was 69.59 (95% CI, 68.29-70.89) years old and 93.8% were male. Other findings included: 85.4% had a low educational level, 23.6% were smokers, 71.5% mild-moderate COPD stage with a FEV1 = 56.86 (SD = 18.85); exacerbations per year = 1.41(95% CI, 1-1.8). The total SGRQ score was 44.96 (95% CI, 42.46-47.46), showing a mild self-perceived impairment in health. The prevalence of adherence (dose/pill count) was 68.1% (95% CI, 60.9-75.3) at V1, 80% (95% CI, 73-87) at V2 and 84% (95% CI, 77.9) at V3. The MGT showed a specificity of 67.34% at V1, 76.19% at V2 and 69.62% at V3. The sensitivity was 53.33% at V1, 66.66% at V2 and 33.33% at V3.The BT showed a specificity of 55.1% at V1, 70.23% at V2 and 67.09% at V3. The sensitivity was 68.88% at V1, 71.43% at V2 and 46.66% at V3. &#xd;
Conclusions: The prevalence of treatment adherence changes over time. Indirect methods (dose/pill count and self-reported) can be useful to detect non-adherence in COPD patients. The combination of MGT and BT is the best approach to test self-reported adherence.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2024-02-09T10:43:12Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-02-09T10:43:12Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Barnestein-Fonseca et al.: Is it possible to diagnose the therapeutic adherence of patients with COPD in clinical practice? A cohort study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2011 11:6. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-11-6</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/30267</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1186/1471-2466-11-6</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Biomed Central LTD</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>