<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T20:48:12Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/31133" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/31133</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:06:13Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/31133">
      <dc:title>Condorcet consistent scoring rules and single-peakedness</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Berga, Dolors</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Correa-Lopera, Guadalupe</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Juegos, Teoría de</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Toma de decisiones</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Elección social</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>We study voting problems with an odd number of agents and single-peaked preferences. With only three alternatives, there are scoring rules that yield the Condorcet winner only for committees of three and five agents. With four or more alternatives, only committees of three agents work. In all these scoring rules, the best and worst alternatives are assigned a score of 1and 0, respectively, and any middle alternative a score between 0 and 1/2 . For five or more alternatives, the score of any middle alternative must be the same, and we call this family semiplurality scoring rules.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2024-04-23T10:08:05Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024-04-23T10:08:05Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Dolors Berga, Guadalupe Correa-Lopera, Bernardo Moreno, Condorcet consistent scoring rules and single-peakedness, Economics Letters, Volume 181, 2019, Pages 199-202, ISSN 0165-1765,</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/31133</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.05.028</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>