2026-05-27T21:07:00Zhttps://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request

oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/342652026-02-03T11:05:13Zcom_10630_2254col_10630_37953

Ramírez Calle, Olga 2024-10-03T09:56:26Z 2024-10-03T09:56:26Z 2011-10-01 Ramírez Calle, O. (2011) “Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model”. 10 (1), pp. 101 - 112. Zagreb (Croacia): Society for the Advancement of Philosophy, Zagreb Croatia, 19/03/2011. https://prolegomena.upf.hr/download/vol-10-2011/no-1/Prolegomena_10_1_2011_Article_Ramirez_Calle_pdf.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10630/34265 The aim of the paper is to propose an alternative model to realist and non-cognitive explanations of the rule-guided use of thick ethical concepts and to examine the implications that may be drawn from this and similar cases for our general understanding of rule-following and the relation between criteria of ap- plication, truth and correctness. It addresses McDowell’s non-cognitivism critique and challenges his defence of the entanglement thesis for thick ethical concepts. Contrary to non-cognitivists, however, I propose to view the relation between the two terms of the entanglement as resulting from the satisfaction of a previ- ously applied moral function. This is what I call a “Three-Fold Model”. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ open access Attribution 4.0 Internacional Ética Between Realism and Non-Cognitivism in Ethics, A Three-Fold-Model. A Three-Fold-Model journal article