<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-30T08:03:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/34284" metadataPrefix="mods">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/34284</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:18:31Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Ramírez Calle, Olga</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2024-10-03T11:17:51Z</mods:dateAvailable>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2024-10-03T11:17:51Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2017-03</mods:dateIssued>
   </mods:originInfo>
   <mods:identifier type="citation">Ramírez Calle, O. (2017) . “Tracing the Territory. A Unitary Foundational Account”. Logos and Episteme. 8 (1), 71 - 95. doi:10.5840/logos-episteme2017814</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10630/34284</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="doi">10.5840/logos-episteme2017814</mods:identifier>
   <mods:abstract>The paper offers an integrative interpretation of the different lines of thought Wittgenstein was inspecting in On Certainty and what he might have been looking for through them. It suggests that we may have been focusing our attention too strongly in the wrong place and comes to a new conclusion about where the real import of these reflections lies. This leads to an answer to the initially posed question of foundationalism that revises the way in which there can be said to be a grounding intention in On Certainty.</mods:abstract>
   <mods:language>
      <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
   </mods:language>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">open access</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:subject>
      <mods:topic>Certeza</mods:topic>
   </mods:subject>
   <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>Tracing the territory: a unitary foundational account</mods:title>
   </mods:titleInfo>
   <mods:genre>journal article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>