<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-29T23:05:45Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/35926" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/35926</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:23:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The diagnosis of mental disorders is influenced by automatic causal reasoning.</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Flores, Amanda</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Cobos-Cano, Pedro Luis</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Hagmayer, York</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Enfermedades mentales - Diagnóstico</dc:subject>
   <dcterms:abstract>Causal knowledge has been shown to affect diagnostic decisions. It is unclear, however, how&#xd;
causal knowledge affects diagnosis. We hypothesized that it influences intuitive reasoning&#xd;
processes. More precisely, we speculated that people automatically assess the coherence&#xd;
between observed symptoms and an assumed causal model of a disorder, which in turn&#xd;
affects diagnostic classification. Intuitive causal reasoning was investigated in an&#xd;
experimental study. Participants were asked to read clinical reports before deciding on a&#xd;
diagnosis. Intuitive processing was studied by analysing reading times. It turned out that&#xd;
reading times were slower when causally expected consequences of present symptoms were&#xd;
missing or effects of absent causes were present. This causal incoherence effect was&#xd;
predictive of participants’ later explicit diagnostic judgments. These and related findings&#xd;
suggest that diagnostic judgments rely on automatic reasoning processes based on the&#xd;
computation of causal coherence. Potential implications of these results for the training of&#xd;
clinicians are discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2025-01-08T07:56:58Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2025-01-08T07:56:58Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2025-01-08T07:56:58Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>Flores, A., Cobos, P.L., &amp; Hagmayer, Y. (2018). The diagnosis of mental disorders is influenced by automatic causal reasoning, Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 1-12</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/35926</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1177/2167702617709560</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>SAGE</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>