2026-06-04T01:44:24Zhttps://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request

oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/361142026-02-03T11:33:14Zcom_10630_2254col_10630_37953

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Ramírez Calle, Olga author 2023-06-07 The present paper departs from the discussion on the foundation of morality in Discourse Ethics (DE) and the criticism raised against it, co- ming to reconstruct in a somewhat different way the foundational process. A first section is dedicated to analysing the difficulties of Habermas distinction between morality and ethics and the criticism raised against it, questioning a) the possibility to set the difference in the distinction between norms and values and b) the presumed neutrality of DE regarding ethical evaluations. A second section revisits the foundational proposal of DE. First of all, it provi- des an interpretation of the Kantian proposal that makes the universalization of norms subservient to the idea of human beings as ends in themselves. It then considers a) the subsistence of Kantian moral reasoning in its architec- tonic and b) suggests a formal structure in practical thinking that integrates in hierarchical modus Kantian, discursive and contextually determined evaluati- ve conceptions. Ramírez Calle, Olga (2022) Discourse Ethics and Practical Knowledge Stable Structures for Practical Reasoning. EPISTEME NS. 42, pp. 53 - 83. Revista Del Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. SCIELO. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_ens/article/view/26595 https://hdl.handle.net/10630/36114 Ética Discourse Ethics and Practical Knowledge. Estable structures for practical reasoning.