<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-27T20:38:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/36471" metadataPrefix="mods">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/36471</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:32:46Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
   <mods:name>
      <mods:namePart>Ropero-García, Miguel Ángel</mods:namePart>
   </mods:name>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2025-01-17T10:10:33Z</mods:dateAvailable>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:extension>
      <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2025-01-17T10:10:33Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
   </mods:extension>
   <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2021</mods:dateIssued>
   </mods:originInfo>
   <mods:identifier type="citation">Ropero MÁ. Entry deterrence when the potential entrant is your competitor in a different market. South Econ J. 2021; 87: 1010–1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12478</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/10630/36471</mods:identifier>
   <mods:identifier type="doi">10.1002/soej.12478</mods:identifier>
   <mods:abstract>In this article, we present a two-period model in which one firm operates in two markets: a monopoly and a duopoly. Assuming that this firm has private information on the cross-price elasticity of demand between the products sold in both markets, it limits its quantity supplied in the monopoly market in order to make its rival in the other market believe that entry into the monopolized market is unprofitable. As a result of this strategy, the average prices observed in both markets increase. This result suggests that the detrimental effects of entry deterrence on consumers´ welfare are stronger than those predicted by previous literature.</mods:abstract>
   <mods:language>
      <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
   </mods:language>
   <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">open access</mods:accessCondition>
   <mods:subject>
      <mods:topic>Monopolios</mods:topic>
   </mods:subject>
   <mods:subject>
      <mods:topic>Competencia económica</mods:topic>
   </mods:subject>
   <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>Entry deterrence when the potential entrant is your competitor in a different market</mods:title>
   </mods:titleInfo>
   <mods:genre>journal article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>