<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-01T23:34:53Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37213" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37213</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:27:22Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37213">
      <dc:title>Economic evaluation of culprit lesion only PCI vs. immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the CULPRIT‑SHOCK trial</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Robles‑Zurita, José Antonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Briggs, Andrew</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Rana, Dikshyanta</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Quayyum, Zahidul</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Oldroyd, Keith G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Zeymer, Uwe</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Desch, Steffen</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>de Waha‑Thiele, Suzanne</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Thiele, Holger</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Infarto de miocardio - Aspectos económicos</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Background The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial compared two treatment strategies for patients with acute myocardial infarction&#xd;
and multivessel coronary artery disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: (a) culprit vessel only percutaneous coronary&#xd;
intervention (CO-PCI), with additional staged revascularisation if indicated, and (b) immediate multivessel PCI (MV-PCI).&#xd;
Methods A German societal and national health service perspective was considered for three different analyses. The cost&#xd;
utility analysis (CUA) estimated costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on a pre-trial decision analytic model&#xd;
taking a lifelong time horizon. In addition, a within trial CUA estimated QALYs and costs for 1 year. Finally, the cost&#xd;
effectiveness analysis (CEA) used the composite primary outcome, mortality and renal failure at 30-day follow-up, and the&#xd;
within trial costs. Econometric and survival analysis on the trial data was used for the estimation of the model parameters.&#xd;
Subgroup analysis was performed following an economic protocol.&#xd;
Results The lifelong CUA showed an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), CO-PCI vs. MV-PCI, of €7010 per QALY&#xd;
and a probability of CO-PCI being the most cost-effective strategy > 64% at a €30,000 threshold. The ICER for the within&#xd;
trial CUA was €14,600 and the incremental cost per case of death/renal failure avoided at 30-day follow-up was €9010.&#xd;
Cost-effectiveness improved with patient age and for those without diabetes.&#xd;
Conclusions The estimates of cost-effectiveness for CO-PCI vs. MV-PCI have been shown to change depending on the time&#xd;
horizon and type of economic evaluation performed. The results favoured a long-term horizon analysis for avoiding underestimation&#xd;
of QALY gains from the CO-PCI arm.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2025-01-28T17:49:25Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-01-28T17:49:25Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2020-10-07</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Robles-Zurita, J.A., Briggs, A., Rana, D. et al. Economic evaluation of culprit lesion only PCI vs. immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Eur J Health Econ 21, 1197–1209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01235-3</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/37213</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1007/s10198-020-01235-3</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>