<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-02T08:32:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37901" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37901</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T10:54:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/37901">
      <dc:title>Cluster sets and traditional sets elicit similar muscular hypertrophy: a volume and effort‑matched study in resistance‑trained individuals</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Vargas-Molina, Salvador</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>García-Sillero, Manuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Maroto-Izquierdo, Sergio</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Baz‑Valle, Eneko</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Bautista‑Mayorga, Borja</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Murri, Mora</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Benítez-Porres, Javier</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Educación física</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Background and Objective Previous studies examining the effects of cluster sets (CS) compared to traditional sets (TS)&#xd;
protocols on muscle hypertrophy have primarily equated to volume load. This inevitably has resulted in a lower number of&#xd;
repetitions performed in TS compared to CS, thereby leading to a suboptimal hypertrophic stimulus. The present study aimed&#xd;
to compare the impact of CS and TS protocols, both performed with the same number of sets and repetitions, but with loads&#xd;
adjusted to the same range of repetitions in reserve (RIR) on muscle hypertrophy.&#xd;
Methods Ten resistance-trained volunteers (7 men and 3 women, 21.0 ± 1.5 years, 64.3 ± 6.9 kg, and 169.3 ± 6.2 cm) partici-&#xd;
pated in this study. Participants performed two training protocols over an 8-week period, with two weekly sessions consisting&#xd;
of 5 sets of 12 repetitions of the leg press and leg extension exercises. The study employed a within-participant, unilateral&#xd;
design where one limb performed a TS protocol and the contralateral limb performed 3 clusters of 4 repetitions with a 20-s&#xd;
intra-set rest period of the same exercises (CS). Muscle thickness was assessed via ultrasound and thigh lean tissue mass&#xd;
was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry pre- and post-study.&#xd;
Results Results showed similar increases in muscle thickness (p &lt; 0.001, ES = 0.56, and p = 0.012, ES = 0.42, respectively)&#xd;
and lean tissue mass (p = 0.002, ES = 0.11, and p &lt; 0.001, ES = 0.13, respectively) in both CS and TS conditions.&#xd;
Conclusion In conclusion, when sets, repetitions, and load adjustments were equalized based on RIR, a CS protocol elicits&#xd;
similar increases in muscle thickness and lean mass compared to a TS protocol</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2025-02-14T13:10:09Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-02-14T13:10:09Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-02</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Vargas-Molina, S., García-Sillero, M., Maroto-Izquierdo, S., Baz-Valle, E., Bautista-Mayorga, B., Murri, M., Schoenfeld, B. J., &amp; Benítez-Porres, J. (2025). Cluster sets and traditional sets elicit similar muscular hypertrophy: a volume and effort-matched study in resistance-trained individuals. European Journal Of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05712-6</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/37901</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1007/s00421-025-05712-6</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>