<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-27T05:35:25Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/38232" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/38232</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:09:16Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/38232">
      <dc:title>Leveling up: Treating Uptake as Endogenous May Increase the Value of Screening Programs.</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Robles-Zurita, José Antonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Hawkins, Neil</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Bouttell, Janet</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Política sanitaria - Aspectos económicos</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/id/publication/9385</dc:description>
      <dc:description>Background. We aimed to illustrate that health economists should consider individual heterogeneity when solving the&#xd;
problem of finding the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity that maximizes the average health utility of&#xd;
a target population in a screening program. Methods. A theoretical framework compares the solution under standard&#xd;
economics of diagnoses to the optimal combination under an endogenous uptake analysis, where screening participation&#xd;
is given by heterogenous health preferences. An applied example used calibrated parameters with real data from&#xd;
the bowel cancer screening program in the United Kingdom. Scenario analyses show how the results would change&#xd;
with parameter values, if disease risk and health utilities were not independent and if screening uptake were not completely&#xd;
determined by health preferences. Results. A general theoretical result states that the endogenous uptake analysis&#xd;
leads to a weakly higher true- and false-positive rate than would be optimal under the standard approach. In the&#xd;
same way, the endogenous solution would lead to a lower uptake rate. The base-case scenario of the applied example&#xd;
illustrates that a screening program using the endogenous solution would generate 21.1% more quality-adjusted lifeyears&#xd;
than when using the standard solution. The scenario analyses show when the endogenous analysis is most&#xd;
valued and that the general result applies for a wide range of situations when theoretical assumptions are relaxed.&#xd;
Limitations. The results obtained are valid under the assumptions made. Analysts should evaluate if those could hold&#xd;
in the applied screening context. Conclusions. Individual heterogeneity and uptake decisions are relevant factors to&#xd;
consider in the problem of finding an optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for a screening test.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2025-03-25T07:22:21Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025-03-25T07:22:21Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>Robles-Zurita JA, Hawkins N, Bouttell J. Leveling up: Treating Uptake as Endogenous May Increase the Value of Screening Programs. Medical Decision Making. 2025;45(3):318-331. doi:10.1177/0272989X251319794</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10630/38232</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1177/0272989X251319794</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Sage</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>