2026-05-30T15:37:46Zhttps://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request

oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/446682026-02-03T11:04:47Zcom_10630_2254col_10630_37953

Salas-Rodríguez, Javier Del Pino-Brunet, Natalia Gómez-Jacinto, Luís Hombrados-Mendieta, Isabel 2026-01-21T12:23:41Z 2025-09 Salas-Rodríguez, J., Del Pino-Brunet, N., Gómez-Jacinto, L., & Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2025b). Activism and radicalism modulate sex differences in interpersonal risks: a dual moderation analysis. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105371 https://hdl.handle.net/10630/44668 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105371 While engagement in risk-taking is highly prevalent during youth, there are individual differences in its expression. Generally, male youth tend to engage in risk-taking more than female youth. However, sex differences in risk-taking behaviors may be modulated by political mobilization processes. The present study analyzed how intentions toward activism and radicalism moderate the relationship between sex and various risk-taking behaviors, including health risks, interpersonal risks, and deviant non-violent behaviors. A total of 496 individuals participated in the study, of which 222 were females (mean age M = 18.27, SD = 2.22, age range 15–24 years). Results showed an interaction effect between sex and intention toward activism and radicalism for interpersonal risks. Theoretical and practical implications of political mobilization on sex differences in risk-taking are discussed. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ open access Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Evaluación del riesgo Activism and radicalism modulate sex differences in interpersonal risks: a dual moderation analysis journal article