<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-30T12:46:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/5631" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riuma.uma.es/rest/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/5631</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-03T11:26:06Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10630_2254</setSpec><setSpec>col_10630_37953</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riuma.uma.es:10630/5631">
      <dc:title>Four temptations against urban renewel: an approach to fur current urban processes</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Rosa-Jiménez, Carlos</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Márquez-Ballesteros, María José</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Martin-Bravo, Pedro</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Rehabilitación urbana</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Comunicación presentada en 25 European Network housing Research International Conference. Tarragona 19 al 22 junio 2013</dc:description>
      <dc:description>The new paradigm of urban social and economic rehabilitation is replacing the&#xd;
current sprawl growth model. But four temptations must be considered:&#xd;
1) The high-density. This process is possible in sprawl model, but its quantification does not&#xd;
seem to be clear, because after a certain threshold of occupancy per unit area, the city seems to&#xd;
collapse and social and environmental benefits disappear, appearing reversal processes city to&#xd;
country in search of a minimum quality of life standards. There is not a model for appropriate&#xd;
density. It depends on the way of life of population, the traditional city model.&#xd;
2) The replacement. Architectonic and urban rehabilitation must be preferred to replacement,&#xd;
except for certain cases to be legally taxed. But as the city cannot be densified and orderly,&#xd;
without the prior replacement of the building, may fit this temptation. Even replacing the&#xd;
building can be made without considering high building standards&#xd;
3) The gentrification. There is a wide doctrine and experience about this phenomenon with&#xd;
serious social consequences. It is very tempting to replace the building, due to improve&#xd;
requirement of broad levels of quality, entering a game of speculation, so common in our real&#xd;
estate market.&#xd;
4) The eco-city. Comprehensive projects are building spaces with low levels of energy&#xd;
consumption. Fall into this temptation means to continue the extensive city model we have been&#xd;
developing, creating new cities far from the existing but incorporating saving measures, and&#xd;
continuing resource consumption</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2013-07-17T10:01:47Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2013-07-17T10:01:47Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
      <dc:type>journal article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10630/5631</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>open access</dc:rights>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>