GENERAL INFORMATION ........................... 1. Dataset title: iVR-MANUALTHERAPY innovation educative Project dataset 2. Authors: Manuel Trinidad-Fernández; Benoît Bossavit; Ivan José Fuentes-Abolafio; Celia García-Conejo; Daniel Mayorga-Vega; Estíbaliz Díaz-Balboa; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas 3. Author contact information: Manuel Trinidad-Fernández; m.trinidad@uma.es, matrfe23@gmail.com METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION ................................. 1. Description of the methods for collection/generation of data: A Mixed-Methods Cluster Randomized Control Trial was performed in manual therapy students of University of Malaga with no prior experience in manual therapy. An iVR application for head-mounted displays was designed to teach a knee manual therapy technique. The Experimental group used the new iVR application during the traditional teaching method class, while the Control group received only the traditional method. User experience (Spanish version of Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire and ad-hoc survey with three questions responsed based on a 5-point Likert scale), iVR experience only in the experimental group (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and three open questions) and learning experience (specific ad-hoc rubric for the femorotibial mobilization technique) were collected quantitatively and qualitatively after the session. Article not published yet: iVR-MANUALTHERAPY. New Learning Manual Therapy Technique Using An Immersive Virtual Reality Environment in Undergraduate Students: A Mixed-Methods Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Manuel Trinidad-Fernández; Benoît Bossavit; Ivan José Fuentes-Abolafio; Celia García-Conejo; Daniel Mayorga-Vega; Estíbaliz Díaz-Balboa; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas 2. Data processing methods Data collected from online surveys using the software Limesurvey (The LimeSurvey Project Team). The only data processing was performed using statistical software to present descriptive data and inferential analysis. 3. Software or instruments needed to interpret the data: The file is in CSV format so anyone can open it. We performed the qualitative analysis using Atlas.ti software, and the quantitative analysis using SPSS software. DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION: ------------------------------------------- 1. Name File: database IVR-MT project - ID.csv 1.1. Variables list: value labels: ID Variable name: Participant ID Description:ID Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: AGE Variable name: Participant age Description: Age Units of measure or value labels: years value labels: GENRE_2M_1F Variable name: Participant genre Description:2=Male, 1=Female Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: CLUSTER Variable name: Participant classroom (cluster) Description: From 1 to 4 Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: Group Variable name: Participant group Description: 1=Control group, 2=Experimental group Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: SSQ1...SSQTOTAL Variable name: Sickness simulator questionnaire Description: From item 1 (SSQ1) to item 16 (SSQ16) and the total score (SSQTOTAL) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: From UEQ1...UEQ8 Variable name: Spanish version of Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire Description: From item 1(UEQ1) to item 8 (UEQ8) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Usability Question 1 Variable name: Do you feel that you retained and understood the concepts of manual therapy effectively? Description: 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represented "Not at all" and 5 "Very much" Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Usability Question 2 Variable name: How satisfied are you with the learning methodology you experienced today? Description: 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represented "Not at all" and 5 "Very much" Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Usability Question 3 Variable name: Did you feel very motivated with today's methodology to learn the manual therapy technique? Description: 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represented "Not at all" and 5 "Very much" Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Final evaluation score Variable name: Final evaluation score of the technique performance Description: From 1 to 10. Final score calculated following this calculation: Patient and therapist placement (10% of the final score); Position of the therapist's hands (10% of the final score); Position of the patient's lower limb (10% of the final score); Height of the stretcher (10% of the final score); Quantity of angulation movement (20% of the final score); Synchrony of angulation and translation (20% of the final score); and Cadence of repetitions (20% of the final score). Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric1 Variable name: Patient and therapist placement Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric2 Variable name: Position of the therapist's hands Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric3 Variable name: Position of the patient's lower limb Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric4 Variable name: Height of the stretcher Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric5 Variable name: Quantity of angulation movement Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric6 Variable name: Synchrony of angulation and translation Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: Rubric7 Variable name: Cadence of repetitions Description: ad-hoc rubric using a scale from 1 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent) Units of measure or value labels: Points value labels: OQ1 Variable name: How would you describe your experience using virtual reality in learning manual therapy? Description: open question Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: OQ2 Variable name: What elements of virtual reality did you find most beneficial for learning manual therapy concepts? Description: open question Units of measure or value labels: N.A. value labels: OQ3 Variable name: In what aspects did virtual reality exceed expectations or fall short compared to traditional teaching? Description: open question Units of measure or value labels: N.A. MORE INFORMATION ------------------- [Include any other information about the dataset that is not reflected in this template and that you consider relevant. Incluya cualquier otra información sobre el conjunto de datos que no haya quedado reflejada en esta plantilla y que considere relevante]