Listar por autor "Yuste-Ginel, Antonio"
Mostrando ítems 1-11 de 11
-
A Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Abstract Argumentation
(2021)This paper introduces a multi-agent dynamic epistemic logic for abstract argumenta- tion. Its main motivation is to build a general framework for modelling the dynamics of a debate, which entails reasoning about goals, ... -
A multi-modal logic for Galois connections
Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo
; Pérez-de-Guzmán-Molina, Inmaculada; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio (College Publications, 2022-07-19)
-
Arguments Evaluation in Multi-Agent Systems
Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio (2018-12-13)
In this paper, a novel problem within the field of Epistemic Logic and Justification Logic is presented. This problem can be stated as follows: how epistemic agents should prefer one justification to another for supporting ... -
Arguments to believe and beliefs to argue. Epistemic logics for argumentation and its dynamics
(UMA Editorial, 2022)Arguing and believing are two skills that have typically played a crucial role in the analysis of human cognition. Both notions have received notable attention from a broad range of disciplines, including linguistics, ... -
Basic Beliefs and Argument-based Beliefs in Awareness Epistemic Logic with Structured Arguments
Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio (IOS PRESS, 2020-09-04)
There are two intuitive principles governing belief formation and argument evaluation that can potentially clash. After arguing that adopting them unrestrictedly leads to an infinite regress, we propose a formal framework ... -
A formal analysis of the notion of preference between deductive arguments
Yuste-Ginel, Antonio; Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo (2018-05-25)
In the last two decades, justification logic has addressed the problem of including justifications into the field of epistemic logic. Nevertheless, there is something that has not received enough attention yet: how epistemic ... -
Formal argumentation and epistemic logic: what can they do for each other?
Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio (2021-11-15)
Arguing and believing are two central cognitive dimensions of both human beings and artificial intelligent agents. The interrelation of these two notions (or groups of notions) is at the root of classic debates in epistemology ... -
Formal Argumentation and Modal Logic.
(College Publications, 2025-03-25)The interrelationship between defeasible argumentation and modal logic is rooted in their shared goal of capturing and modelling reasoning under uncertainty and changing conditions. In the last years, researchers have ... -
From preferences between arguments to preferences between explanations
Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo; Yuste-Ginel, Antonio (2018-04-06)
In this ongoing work we present a new approach to the problem of argument evaluation. According to our view the notion of preference between deductive arguments is reducible to simpler notions. Departuring from this analysis ... -
On the Tension between Belief Formation and Argument Evaluation
Yuste-Ginel, Antonio; Burrieza-Muñiz, Alfredo (2019-09-06)
There exists certain circularity between the formation of some epistemic atti- tudes of an agent and the way she assesses her available arguments. For the sake of simplicity, I will restrict my attention to the case of ... -
Persuasive argumentation and epistemic attitudes
(2019-10-16)These slides present the main notions and results of a work under construction that was presented in the 2nd DaLí Workshop, Dynamic Logic: New Trends and Applications in Porto, 9 October, 2019 and later published in the ...