JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo RIUMAComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditoresEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditores

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    DE INTERÉS

    Datos de investigaciónReglamento de ciencia abierta de la UMAPolítica de RIUMAPolitica de datos de investigación en RIUMAOpen Policy Finder (antes Sherpa-Romeo)Dulcinea
    Preguntas frecuentesManual de usoContacto/Sugerencias
    Ver ítem 
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Ponencias, Comunicaciones a congresos y Pósteres
    • Ver ítem
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Ponencias, Comunicaciones a congresos y Pósteres
    • Ver ítem

    Development of an Activity Patterns Scale (APS)

    • Autor
      Esteve-Zarazaga, RosaAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Ramírez-Maestre, María del CarmenAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; López-Martínez, Alicia EvaAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena RocíoAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Ruiz-Párraga, Gema TeresaAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Morales, Ángelines; Peters, Madelon L.
    • Fecha
      2015-10-01
    • Palabras clave
      Dolor
    • Resumen
      Six activity patterns were identified across various self-report measures in participants with chronic pain: Pain Avoidance, Activity Avoidance; Task Contingent Persistence; Excessive Persistence, Pain Contingent Persistence and Pacing (Kindermans et al., 2011). It was proposed that instruments assessing “pacing” should include items addressing one specific pacing behavior (breaking tasks into smaller pieces; taking frequent short rests and speeding up or slowing down) with a single goal (increasing activity level, conserve energy for valued activities and pain reduction) (Nielson et al., 2013). The aim of the present study was to develop an instrument to assess the activity patterns identified by Kindermans et al. (2011). The instrument also included three pacing scales one for each of the aforementioned goals. Methods A sample of 229 patients with fibromyalgia and 62 suffering other rheumatic diseases answered online the APS and the “Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain” (POAM-P) (Cane et al., 2007). Three alternative factor structures were tested by confirmatory factor analyses performed via structural equation modelling. . Results The structure with the best fit had 8 factors corresponding to the hypothesized scales: Pain Avoidance (α=.60), Activity Avoidance (α=.60); Task Contingent Persistence (α=.81); Excessive Persistence (α=.84), Pain Contingent Persistence (α=.70), Pacing for increasing activity (α=.76), Pacing for energy conservation (α=.72) and Pacing for pain reduction (α=.65). The correlations with the POAM-P scales were high and in the postulated direction. Conclusions The APS showed adequate reliability and structural validity. According to these results, Avoidance, Persistence and Pacing seem to be multidimensional constructs.
    • URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10630/10404
    • Compartir
      RefworksMendeley
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros
    VIENA-ROSA.pdf (565.6Kb)
    Colecciones
    • Ponencias, Comunicaciones a congresos y Pósteres

    Estadísticas

    Buscar en Dimension
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
     

     

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA