Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSaborido, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Barranquero, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T08:51:39Z
dc.date.available2019-11-19T08:51:39Z
dc.date.created2019
dc.date.issued2019-11-19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/18845
dc.description.abstractIn this talk, I attempt to shed light on the philosophical debate about the theoretical definition of aging from the discussion of the notion of disease in the philosophy of medicine. As a result, I introduce a concrete approach -- the pragmatist approach to aging -- to account for the theoretical relationship between the notions of disease and aging, as they are addressed in the philosophy of aging. To that end, the structure of this work is as follows: first, in section 2, I analyze the discussion between the two major positions in this debate, and introduce the influential accounts of authors such as Hayflick, Schramme, Caplan, Murphy, and Callahan & Topinkova. I will show that in this discussion it is being assumed by some authors that the definition of disease is univocal and corresponds to what some of these authors understand as a "non-natural state". The motivation of this is straightforward: in order to decide if aging should be defined as a disease we need to clarify first what a disease is and what implies to characterize something as such. In section 3, I will show that the disagreement between those who argue that aging is a disease and those who claim that it is not is ultimately based on an assumption of different notions of disease. In addition, I will also turn to the debate on disease in the philosophy of medicine to analyze the proposals of Callahan & Topinkova and Murphy. These authors advocate avoiding the question of whether or not aging is a disease for pragmatic reasons. The important thing would not be to define aging as a disease but to medically treat it as such. I propose to reformulate this proposal of pragmatic motivation to frame it in an approach to the concept of disease, which I call "pragmatist", that has advocated philosophers of medicine such as Cooper or Hofmann. I think that this pragmatist approach addresses the issue of medical categorization of aging in a more scientific and philosophical fruitful way.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectEnvejecimiento - Filosofíaen_US
dc.subjectMedicina - Filosofíaen_US
dc.subjectEnfermedades - Factores de edad - Filosofíaen_US
dc.subject.otherAgingen_US
dc.subject.otherDiseaseen_US
dc.titleIs aging a disease? The theoretical definition of aging in the light of the philosophy of medicineen_US
dc.typeconference outputen_US
dc.centroFacultad de Filosofía y Letrasen_US
dc.relation.eventtitleSalzburg Conference for Young Analytic Philosophy 2019en_US
dc.relation.eventplaceUniversiy of Salzburgen_US
dc.relation.eventdate18-20 de septiembreen_US
dc.departamentoFilosofía
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem