Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVargas, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorPetro, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorCarbone, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorBonilla, Diego
dc.contributor.authorChulvi-Medrano, Iván
dc.contributor.authorBenítez-Porres, Javier
dc.contributor.authorVargas-Molina
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-25T08:22:36Z
dc.date.available2019-11-25T08:22:36Z
dc.date.created2019
dc.date.issued2019-11-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/18886
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether an anterior-posterior (hip thrust [HT]) movement generated higher post-activation potentiation (PAP) levels on broad jump (BJ) in comparison to an axial-component exercise (deadlift [DL]). Fifteen resistance-trained rugby players participated in this study (age, 22.7 ± 1.6; body weight, 89.9 ± 10.6; height, 181.8 ± 6.5; BMI, 27.2 ± 2.3; 1RM DL 1RM, 117 ± 20.6; 1RM HT, 133.3 ± 21.5. Subjects attended four sessions to the laboratory with seven days between each session. Anthropometric measurements and one-repetition maximum (1-RM) estimations for HT and DL (grip width 72 cm) were performed in the first and third sessions, while PAP tests for both exercise protocols were performed during the second and fourth sessions (subjects performed two repetitions at 90% 1-RM with 8 minutes of recovery between HT and DL exercises, and then the BJ was performed). Data were analyzed by a general lineal model (GLM) with repeated measures and a delta analysis (Δ = post – pre) was performed to determine the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the mean. The GLM showed both significant difference and large effect size on BJ per Time [pre vs. post] (P > 0.001; ηp2 = 0.990), but no differences on Time x Protocol interaction (P = 0.452; ηp2=0.020) or per Group (0.748; ηp2 = 0.004) were found. There were significant changes [X ± SD, CIs 95%] on BJ after HT (5.2±5.6, 2.1–8.3; P = 0.03) and DL (6.9±5.3, 4.0–9.9: P < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the exercise protocols (P = 0.748). Our results suggest that DL and HP provided with large effects on PAP to improve the BJ outcomes, but there was no difference between these exercises.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMúsculos - Potenciaciónen_US
dc.subjectCaderaen_US
dc.subjectEjercicio físico - Aspectos fisiológicosen_US
dc.subject.otherImpulseen_US
dc.subject.otherConditioning Activityen_US
dc.subject.otherWarm-Up Exerciseen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscle Poweren_US
dc.subject.otherResistance Trainingen_US
dc.titleComparison of potentiation post-activation responses in two dominant hip strength exercisesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.eventtitleBritish Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Conference 2019en_US
dc.relation.eventplaceLeicester (Reino Unido)en_US
dc.relation.eventdate18/11/2019en_US
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional