JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo RIUMAComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentros

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    DE INTERÉS

    Datos de investigaciónReglamento de ciencia abierta de la UMAPolítica de RIUMAPolitica de datos de investigación en RIUMASHERPA/RoMEODulcinea
    Preguntas frecuentesManual de usoDerechos de autorContacto/Sugerencias
    Ver ítem 
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Farmacología y Pediatría - (FP)
    • FP - Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Farmacología y Pediatría - (FP)
    • FP - Artículos
    • Ver ítem

    A revised electronic version of RUCAM for the diagnosis of DILI

    • Autor
      Hayashi, Paul H.; Lucena-González, María IsabelAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Fontana, Robert J.; Bjornsson, Einar S.; Aithal, Guruprasad P.; [et al.]
    • Fecha
      2022
    • Editorial/Editor
      Wiley
    • Palabras clave
      Hígado - Enfermedades; Enfermedades - Diagnóstico
    • Resumen
      Background and Aims: Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) for DILI has been hindered by subjectivity and poor reliability. We sought to improve the RUCAM using data from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) and the Spanish DILI Registry, published literature, and it- erative computer modeling. Approach and Results: RUCAM criteria were updated, clarified, and com- puterized. We removed criteria 3 (risk factors) for lack of added value and cri- teria 4 because we felt it more useful to assess each drug separately. Criteria 6 (drug-specific risk) was anchored to LiverTox likelihood scores. Iterative testing in subsets of 50–100 single-agent, nonherbal cases from both regis- tries was done to optimize performance. We used classification tree analysis to establish diagnostic cutoffs for this revised electronic causality assessment method (RECAM) and compared RECAM with RUCAM for correlation with expert opinion diagnostic categories in 194 DILI cases (98 DILIN, 96 Spanish DILI). Area under receiver operator curves for identifying at least probable DILI were the same at 0.89 for RECAM and RUCAM. However, RECAM diagnostic categories have better observed overall agreement with expert opinion (0.62 vs. 0.56 weighted kappa, p = 0.14), and had better sensitivity to detect extreme diagnostic categories (73 vs. 54 for highly likely or high probable, p = 0.02; 65 vs. 48 for unlikely/excluded, p = 0.08) than RUCAM diagnostic categories. Conclusions: RECAM is an evidence-based update that is at least as capa- ble as RUCAM in diagnosing DILI compared with expert opinion but is better than RUCAM at the diagnostic extremes. RECAM’s increased objectivity and clarity will improve precision, reliability, and standardization of DILI diagnosis, but further refinement and validation in other cohorts are needed.
    • URI
      https://hdl.handle.net/10630/23905
    • Compartir
      RefworksMendeley
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros
    RECAM_Hep_draft_Proof_hi.pdf (2.096Mb)
    Colecciones
    • FP - Artículos

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso
    Buscar en Dimension
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
     

     

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA