Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRon-Angevin, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro 
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Clara
dc.contributor.authorMaigrot, Jeanne
dc.contributor.authorMeunier, Juliette
dc.contributor.authorTavard, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorLespinet-Najib, Véronique
dc.contributor.authorAndré, Jean-Marc
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-23T11:10:39Z
dc.date.available2023-02-23T11:10:39Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-23
dc.identifier.citationRon-Angevin R, Fernández-Rodríguez Á, Dupont C, Maigrot J, Meunier J, Tavard H, Lespinet-Najib V, André J-M. Comparison of Two Paradigms Based on Stimulation with Images in a Spelling Brain–Computer Interface. Sensors. 2023; 23(3):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031304es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/26051
dc.description.abstractA P300-based speller can be used to control a home automation system via brain activity. Evaluation of the visual stimuli used in a P300-based speller is a common topic in the field of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). The aim of the present work is to compare, using the usability approach, two types of stimuli that have provided high performance in previous studies. Twelve participants controlled a BCI under two conditions, which varied in terms of the type of stimulus employed: a red famous face surrounded by a white rectangle (RFW) and a range of neutral pictures (NPs). The usability approach included variables related to effectiveness (accuracy and information transfer rate), efficiency (stress and fatigue), and satisfaction (pleasantness and System Usability Scale and Affect Grid questionnaires). The results indicated that there were no significant differences in effectiveness, but the system that used NPs was reported as significantly more pleasant. Hence, since satisfaction variables should also be considered in systems that potential users are likely to employ regularly, the use of different NPs may be a more suitable option than the use of a single RFW for the development of a home automation system based on a visual P300-based speller.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partially supported by the project PID2021-127261OB-I00 (SICODIS), funded by MCIN (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación)/AEI (Agencia Estatal de Investigación)/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional). The work was also partially supported by the University of Málaga (Universidad de Málaga). Partial funding for open access charge: Universidad de Málagaes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIOAP-MDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAutomatizaciónes_ES
dc.subject.otherBrain–computer interface (BCI)es_ES
dc.subject.otherEvent-related potential (ERP)es_ES
dc.subject.otherRow-column paradigm (RCP)es_ES
dc.subject.otherStimuluses_ES
dc.subject.otherFacees_ES
dc.subject.otherPicturees_ES
dc.titleComparison of Two Paradigms Based on Stimulation with Images in a Spelling Brain–Computer Interfacees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s23031304
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.departamentoTecnología Electrónica
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem