Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRomero-Ruiz, Adolfo 
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Salgado, Juan
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Arana, Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Frutos, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T11:57:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T11:57:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.identifier.citationRomero, A., Gómez-Salgado, J., Romero-Arana, A., & Ruiz-Frutos, C. (2018). Utilization of a healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to identify error sources in the preanalytical phase in two tertiary hospital laboratories. Biochemia medica, 28(2), 340-346.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/29210
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The presence of errors in the preanalytical phase is a thoroughly studied problem. A strategy to increase their source detection might be the use of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA). The aim of this study is improving the capacity of identifying sources of error during the preanalytical period in samples provided by primary care clinics (PCC) with the use of the HFMEA as a tool in the laboratories of two tertiary hospitals. Materials and methods: A HFMEA was carried out in each laboratory, by means of the creation of groups of experts with similar characteristics (doctors and nurses from PCC and laboratory, support staff, and laboratory technicians). The Risk Priority Number (RPN) was calculated. Results: Items with elevated RPN were presented in both centers. The highest RPN were in LAB1: “two request notes for a patient” and “the segregation of oncology urgent samples” (both with 384), while in LAB2 was “the lack of information in patients with oral glucose overload test” (RPN 576). Considering the different steps in the preanalytical phase, LAB1 paid attention in sampling, samples reception and the programming in the Laboratory Information System, while LAB2 paid attention in the request form, the appointment system, sampling procedures, transport and reception. Conclusion: The laboratories prioritized the problems differently. However, both centers offer solutions to these possible sources of error. We proposed improvement actions that can be resolved easily, with a low cost for the system, mainly to schedule a specific formative programme and a deep revision of the existing protocols.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación Progreso y Salud (FPS 0509/2014)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSociedad Croata de Bioquímica Clínicaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectErrores de diagnósticoes_ES
dc.subject.otherPreanalytical phasees_ES
dc.subject.otherHealthcare Failure Modees_ES
dc.subject.otherEffects analysises_ES
dc.subject.otherErrorses_ES
dc.subject.otherQuality assessmentes_ES
dc.titleUtilization of a healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to identify error sources in the preanalytical phase in two tertiary hospital laboratorieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.11613/BM.2018.020713
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.departamentoEnfermería
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem