Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorOlveira, José
dc.contributor.authorLabella Vera, Alejandro Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCutrín, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBaro, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorBorrego, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorDopazo, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-03T10:02:18Z
dc.date.available2024-10-03T10:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-19
dc.identifier.citationMoreno P, Olveira JG, Labella A, Cutrín JM, Baro JC, Borrego JJ, Dopazo CP. Surveillance of viruses in wild fish populations in areas around the Gulf of Cadiz (South Atlantic Iberian Peninsula). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6560-71. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02090-14. Epub 2014 Aug 15. PMID: 25128341; PMCID: PMC4178629.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/34266
dc.description.abstractThis report describes a viral epidemiological study of wild fish around the Gulf of Cadiz (southwestern Iberian Peninsula) and is focused on infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV), and viral nervous necrosis virus (VNNV). One fish species (Chelon labrosus) was sampled inside the gulf, at the mouth of the San Pedro River. Another 29 were sampled, in three oceanographic campaigns, at sites around the Bay of Cadiz. The fish were processed individually and subjected to isolation in cell culture and molecular diagnosis. VHSV was not isolated from any species. Thirteen IPNV-type isolates were obtained from barracuda (Sphyraena sphyraena), axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne), common two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris), common pandora (P. erythrinus), Senegal seabream (D. bellottii), and surmullet (Mullus surmuletus). Six VNNV isolates were obtained from axillary seabream, common pandora, black seabream (Spondyliosoma cantharus), red mullet (Mullet barbatus), Lusitanian toadfish (Halobatrachus didactylus), and tub gurnard (Chelidonichtys lucerna). In the river mouth, viruses were detected only after reamplification, obtaining prevalence percentages of IPNV and VNNV (44.4 and 63.0%, respectively) much higher than those observed in the oceanographic campaigns (25.7 and 19.6%, respectively). The opposite results were obtained in the case of VHSV after reamplification: 11.1% in the river mouth and 43.6% in the oceanic locations. Analyzing the results with respect to the proximity of the sampling sites to the coast, an anthropogenic influence on wild fish is suggested and discussed. The type of viruses and the presence of natural reassortants are also discussed.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectViruses_ES
dc.subjectAtlánticoes_ES
dc.subjectPeceses_ES
dc.subject.otherViruseses_ES
dc.subject.otherWild fishes_ES
dc.subject.otherSouth Atlantices_ES
dc.titleSurveillance of Viruses in Wild Fish Populations in Areas around the Gulf of Cadiz (South Atlantic Iberian Peninsula)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Cienciases_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02090-14
dc.rights.ccAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional